For those of us who drive, we’ve all been there haven’t we?
We imagine ourselves in an extravagant situation, whizzing around, looking
super-fly, but in reality, we’ve got a budget. I would presume it is many a man’s
goal to own a Lambo, or a Ferrari to show that they have truly made it in the
world, and it would be an added bonus to have a chick in the passenger seat who
is in no way gold-digging. But what could be better? Well, Daihatsu are giving you
more. Five seats in fact, to accommodate
all those beautiful women that you meet. Sexist? Or is it just a piece of
marketing genius?
Previous analysis of this advertisement merely picked up on
the effect of humour in this advertisement which is, of course, incredibly
prominent. However, there is much more to it than that. Contrast is used quite deliberately
within this ad, in order to turn this fairly mediocre mini-van into what has
been stated as a “babe magnet” in the passage (see below the picture). By
placing five beautiful, and fairly scantily-clad women within the van, it
suddenly becomes more appealing, if not unrealistic (Cialdini, 2007). We aren’t
looking at the teeny-tiny wheels or the fairly awful colour choice anymore,
instead, we are looking at a very excited male and his entourage.
The most obvious use of contrast is of course the comparison between this mini-van and a Lamborghini. Interestingly, it works incredibly well, despite the fact that a Lamborghini would be considered much better and faster than what we are presented with. The use of humour and connotations towards sex, for example, “six seats, four of them reclining!” and “two sun roofs for when things get hot” make the Daihatsu seem better due to spaciousness that a Lamborghini doesn’t have. Not only that, but the ad goes on to contrast the prices, the mini-van being a “£167, 503 change”, using money as a weapon that everyone can relate to.
The most obvious use of contrast is of course the comparison between this mini-van and a Lamborghini. Interestingly, it works incredibly well, despite the fact that a Lamborghini would be considered much better and faster than what we are presented with. The use of humour and connotations towards sex, for example, “six seats, four of them reclining!” and “two sun roofs for when things get hot” make the Daihatsu seem better due to spaciousness that a Lamborghini doesn’t have. Not only that, but the ad goes on to contrast the prices, the mini-van being a “£167, 503 change”, using money as a weapon that everyone can relate to.
The use of social proof is brilliant here, in fact my
favourite part of the ad. Look at average Joe here. He is so happy and
genuinely chuffed with himself for buying this mini-van and of course finding
these girls. It looks like he made the best decision of his life. Festinger (1954)
said that when we look at people similar to ourselves we are more likely to
relate with them and therefore buy the product. By using a normal young guy, not only will people relate,
but they may feel that they will be able to afford this product and look cool
as a result of purchase. Parks, Sanna & Berel (2001) said that we use the
actions of others to decide behaviour for ourselves, particularly if there is a
strong sense of similarity. Therefore, Daihatsu may have got this spot on.
The ‘halo effect’ is also used in this ad, albeit rather unsubtly.
Primacy effect is the tendency to be influenced by what information we gather
first and those who we deem physically attractive are considered in a more
positive manner (Schneider, Gruman & Coutts, 2012). By using attractive
women in this advertisement, Daihatsu create positive associations about the
mini-van, as if it somehow ‘passes the test’ for these women to be seen in it.
So if you want to attract the babes (note: plural), go for
the mini-van. After all, it’s better suited for physical needs when you manage
to score!
Amber Kalejs
Amber Kalejs
References:
Parks, C. D., Sanna, L. J., & Berel, S. R. (2001).
Actions of similar others as inducements to cooperate in social dilemmas. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 345-354.
Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison
Processes. Human Relations, 7,
117-140.
Schneider, F., J. Gruman, L. Coutts. (2012). Applied Social
Psychology: Understanding and Addressing Social and Practical Problems. Second
edition. Sage: Los Angeles, CA.
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of
Persuasion. New York: HarperCollins
Good tone. Id say that association is also important here.
ReplyDelete