According to
the past studies of consumer behaviour, consumers’ choice of retail outlets is
influenced by their own shopping preference for a particular product. Consumers
usually choose to shop online to get better-valued products, but they would
also purchase at stores to minimize the purchase risk (Bhatnagar et al., 2000; Korgaonkar, 1982). The field
of fashion and luxury items is often categorized in the high purchasing rate
area, however, online outlet shops like “BrandAlley”, which is famous for its fashion
and designer sales, are still very popular among the consumers. The compliance
tactics used by BrandAlley will be analyzed, which also applies to most of the
other luxury online outlets.
Price is
often related to the quality of the product (Monroe and Petroshius, 1981), and higher priced items are usually
also indicators of higher social status (Veblen, 1965). Social status symbols can be explained
by the rules of “liking’ and “social proof’. BrandAlley’s target group of
consumers can be largely divided into two groups: people who want to process a
designer item but wouldn't like to spend as much money, or the smart buyers,
who tend to purchase the item for the sake of it being discounted. These two
groups are highly interactive.
One simple
tactic that is used a lot on the website is “scarcity”. It is heavily
advertised with those massive pressuring signs everywhere (ENDS ON 2ND FEB!),
and I have to admit that it works, at least for me. Also, once you have chosen
an item, a red warning would appear saying “this item will be in your basket
for 20 minutes”. This indicates the uniqueness of the product perfectly without
saying too much. Moreover, as a costumer you’ll have to sign in or sign up to
view the items, which naturally means that you will have to be a member of it,
the tactic of commitment?
Another very
obvious tactic being “contrast”, contrast of the original prices and discounted
prices. According to the study of Schindler (1989), consumers’ satisfaction
increases with the increase of the discount. The online shop has also used the
“referral” tactic: “10 pounds off your next shopping when you recommend us to a
friend!”
The effect of
“mere exposure” might as well contribute to the profit of the shop. Once you
become a member, you are very likely to receive their weekly (or even daily)
emails and just by checking the emails (or deleting them), one may find it easier
to accept deals from the shop simply because it is exposed to you more than the
others.
References:
Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S.
and Rao, R.H. (2000), “On risk, convenience, and internet shopping behavior”,
Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, pp. 98-105.
Korgaonkar, P.K. (1982),
“Consumer preferences for catalog showrooms and discount stores: the moderating
role of product risk”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 58, pp. 76-88.
Monroe, K.B. & S.M.
Petroshius. (1981). ‘Buyers’ subjective perception of price: An update of the
evidence’. In: T. Robertson and H. Kassarjian (eds.), Perspectives in consumer
behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. pp. 43-55.
Schindler,
R.M. (1988). The role of ego-expressive factors in the consumer's satisfaction
with price. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining
behavior, 1, 34-39.
Veblen. T., 1965. The
theory of the leisure class. New York: A.M. Kelly. (Original work published
1899.)
Hui Xie (Blog 2)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.