This New Zealand television advert encapsulates the
modelling behaviour fundamental to child development, showing the way children
learn socially undesirable behaviours from the individuals around them, and
persuading these individuals, particularly parents, to act in a positive and
influential way.
Whilst the initial analysis of this advert focussed heavily
on the anticipatory regret of target parents, it forgets to talk about the
important imagery of dependency and responsibility, and the way in which this
evokes an anticipatory emotion in the adult audience and persuades their
influential behaviour.
Firstly, the use of children and parents in a modelling
situation is a technique used to heighten the sensitivity of persuasion
(Pratkanis & Gliner, 2004), and in combination with the feelings of guilt
and embarrassment from the adult audience, individuals are influenced to acting
in a more positive way as role models.
Carlsmith and Gross (1969) induced students into thinking they
gave others painful shocks and found that those guilty students were more
likely to comply to a behaviour than the control group. Similarly, Apsler et al
(1975) had students perform a set of four embarrassing acts in front of each
other. Compared to a control group, those embarrassed students were more likely
to consent to help another student regardless of whether they had witnessed the
embarrassing event or not.
As well as evoking these emotions of embarrassment and guilt
in the adult target audience, the use of the negativity effect as an overriding
theme gives rise to the true persuasiveness of this advert. Hodges (1974) found
that giving individuals negative information had a greater impact than those
individuals given positive information.
Lakhita Uppal
Reference
Pratkanis (2007). The science of social
influence: Advances and future progress. Psychology Press
More needs to be done to explain the concepts you talk of and be sure to include a conclusion!
ReplyDelete