Applied Behavioural analysis (ABA) is an area in Psychology which
has evolved from the work of B.F. Skinner and can be explained well by Thorndike’s
‘Law of Effect’ which states that behaviours that produce a satisfying effect in a
particular situation become more likely to occur again in that situation, and behaviours
that produce a discomforting effect become less likely to occur again in that
situation (Thorndike, 1927). The aims
of ABA are to alter and change behavioural problems through focusing on looking
at the way in which environmental events preceding the undesirable behaviour
(antecedents) and those following the behaviour (consequences) relate to the
behaviour itself. A behaviour analyst will try to identify along with a client,
behavioural problems which need to be reduced, and also may look for desirable
behaviours which could be increased. They will then look at the relation the
target behaviour has with antecedents and consequences, i.e. what causes this
behaviour and what are the results of it. Once this is done, they will work
with the client to alter this relationship in a way that helps decrease the
frequency (for undesirable behaviours) or increase the frequency (for desirable
behaviours) of the target behaviour occurring.
When looking in terms of the workplace, imagine yourself to
be a manager of a small team. In team meetings, one particular member keeps on interrupting
others when they are trying to discuss points but at the same time does bring
up some good ideas themselves. Clearly, they are showing an aversive and
undesirable behaviour which is the fact that they talk over other team members.
For the next couple of meetings you therefore need to observe this behaviour
and try and make note of the antecedents and consequences of the behaviour and
how often it is occurring. After doing so, you realise they interject whenever
they hear an opinion they disagree with, and following their behaviour, the consequential
action is that they are listened to by everyone and the other persons point
remains unheard. So, as a result, you decide you need to alter this by changing
the consequential action which is positively reinforcing their behaviour. To do
this you decide to take away attention from them when they begin this behaviour
by immediately interrupting them to ask the other person to continue with their
original point. This will clearly demonstrate you disapprove of their
behaviour. It is important to do this immediately as this makes the reinforcement
more likely to work due to the fact that with a delay, other behaviour occurs
which could then instead be reinforced. To ensure this has worked, you need to
have an idea of how often the behaviour occurred in meetings before you started
altering the consequence and compare this to after you have begun using it for a
while. This can then be measured simply by plotting a frequency graph. In
addition, as this person was making good points, you would like to encourage
this behaviour. To do this, you could alter the antecedent of this by asking
them of their opinion after other team members have had their own ideas heard.
By then following this up with praise, you will be able to alter their
behaviour so that they will wait for you to ask before interrupting others to
make their own point heard.
George Coe
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms, an
experimental analysis.
Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. The American
Journal of Psychology.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.