When we
negotiate, we do not just make decisions based on how we feel, rather we draw
from different sources to help us evaluate the situation we're dealing with.
Initially, there is more than one party involved and both parties aim is to
maximise the outcome by contributing less input. However, while one party most
likely experiences a loss, the other party will win the deal.
This video clip
was a short scene from the movie “Jobs”, where Ashton Kutcher who plays Steve
Jobs approached Paul Terrell to set up a contract for his computer shop. What you didn't see before this scene was that
Wozniak gave a demonstration of the Apple 1 at a computer lab called Homebrew
Computer Club. Paul Terrell saw the demonstration and expressed his interest
but didn't say explicitly that he wanted to make a deal.
So how did
Steve Jobs or Ashton approach the negotiation situation? The basic idea of
sales was that we can be easily tricked into buying items that we do not need
and even more into buying items, we can’t have (Cialdini, 2007). Just bringing
to view the label "limited edition" is enough to trigger our hunting
instinct. One negotiation tactic used by Ashton was to create the sense of
scarcity by saying that many retailers looked at his computers. Not only did he
say that there are other parties considering to seal a deal with him, he also
said that Paul was the chosen one out of all of those retailers and therefore
should consider the offer now before the opportunity is gone. This is due to
the fact that Jobs hinted out his that his products are close to been gone. In
other words, he placed time pressure on Paul ,ultimately leaving Paul with less
time to explore his alternatives, almost deliberately commanding him to make an
abrupt decision. As a result, he'll be more inclined to create a contract
between him and Jobs (Stuhlmacher & Champagne , 2000).
Paul on the
other hand was aware that not many retailers wanted to buy Apple 1, as not many
people seem to have been interested in their computer. He stated this during
the negotiation. Ashton (Jobs) appeared to be very confident and argued that he
does actually have alternatives. In other words, Ashton made it appear as if he
had a better BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement). Berscheid
(1966) argued that similarity is factor that can convince us to negotiate into
things that appeal to us. For example, Ashton Kutcher related to the targets
name by saying that his middle name is also Paul. Drawing a simple familiarity
between both parties can lead to a sense of trust, considering the fact that
people ally themselves with things that they are familiar with, as familiarity
is related to trust.
Berscheid , E. (1966) Opinion
change and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 4, 670-680.
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence:
The psychology of persuasion. S.l.: Collins.
Stuhlmacher, A. F., &
Champagne, M. V. (2000). The impact of time pressure and information on process
and decisions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 471-491.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.