Imagine my worry when I could not be available on the date a
placement needed me to start from. Catastrophising that the arrangement would
be called off, I employed a couple of negotiation tactics. To my relief, a new
date was arranged.
First of all, I told them why I could not begin the
placement on that particular date. Providing a reason has been shown to affect
the decision process of those you negotiate with. Langer, Blank and Chanowitz
(1978) observed whether people would allow someone to skip the photocopying
queue in a library if a simple reason was provided. Saying “Excuse me, I have
five pages. May I use the Xerox machine because I have to make some copies”?
was significantly more effective at skipping the queue than saying “excuse me,
I have five pages. May I use the Xerox machine”?. The confederate was
essentially saying the same thing in both sentences, by implying that five
pages is a menial amount and therefore she would not take long to copy them.
However, the presence of the word ‘because’ in the first example explicitly
introduces a reason to the situation, and people like to be provided with
reasons for decisions they make (Bastardi & Shafir, 2000). So, by
explaining why I could not begin my placement on the company’s requested date,
I was signalling that I had a legitimate reason to request a later date.
Therefore, appearing legitimate may lead to people feeling more comfortable
about accommodating a request.
I also “assessed my BANTA” (best alternative to negotiated
agreement; Malhotra & Bazerman, 2008, p. 20). As well as providing a reason
why I could not fit in with their timeframe, I thought about all my alternative
options. I considered which of the prior arrangements could be rearranged, and
because the second year exams were not finishing until late June, there was no
way I could change these arrangements. Of course, one alternative option that
came to mind was to call the placement off, but the experience was too valuable
to pass by. So my best alternative was to offer to complete the one-day
induction before my exams started, so as well as starting late, I was not going
to be behind everyone else too. To my delight, this was granted, and visiting
them on this day turned out to be really useful because I met staff, completed
paperwork and took a tour, all in preparation for the actual placement which
would commence after my exams. Consequently, actually starting the placement
was not daunting, as I had already met staff I would be working with.
I employed these tactics before ever learning about them.
This shows that they occur in everyday behaviour, but understanding them better
has helped me to understand how I can become a more efficient negotiator. This will
become especially useful to me as I enter a career in teaching.
REFERENCES
Bastardi, A., & Shafir, E. (2000). Nonconsequential
reasoning and its consequences. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 216-219.
Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The
mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic”
information in interpersonal interaction. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635-642.
Malhotra, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Negotiation Genius. New York: Bantam
Dell.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.