This scene from “Up” shows Russell trying to
convince Carl Fredrickson to let him help him in some way so he can earn his
“Assisting the Elderly” badge to become a Senior Wilderness Explorer.
Russell tries to use the Door-in-the-Face technique
to try and convince Carl into letting him help, but unfortunately he’s not that
successful. He first offers to help cross the street to which Carl impatiently
refuses. Russell then lowers the offer, suggesting to help Carl cross his yard
which Carl still declines, so finally Russell offers to help Carl cross his
porch – an even smaller offering. Carl still doesn’t want any help, and Russell
is on the receiving end of (literally, at this point) Carl’s front door in his
face. In the end, Carl feels sorry for Russell and tells him he can help find a
bird called a “snipe” that keeps eating his flowers. Of course, this is just to
get Russell to go away, but it keeps Russell happy and illustrates how Russell
didn’t really care what he helped with, but started big so he could negotiate
Carl down if he needed to.
Cialdini, Vincent, Lewis & Catalan (1975) found
that people were much more willing to volunteer with delinquents visiting a zoo
for one day or to volunteer on their university campus, after first declining
to volunteer with delinquents for two years, compared those who had not
received the larger, initial request. In this way, Russell was hoping to get
Carl to agree to any tiny request by starting big: if he’d gone in small he
would have been less likely to convince Carl to let him help.
Interestingly, after shutting the door on Russell,
Carl seems upset and a little bit guilty, so opens the door to hear Russell out
again. O’Keefe and Figge (1999) found that people who refuse an initial request
feel guilty, and one of the reasons we later agree to smaller requests is
because we attempt to reduce these feelings of guilt. This anticipated
reduction in guilt is what motivates Carl (well, partly that and partly to get
rid of Russell) to give Russell a task he thinks is helpful.
Little does Carl know, Russell ends up helping him
with something extremely important (which I won’t ruin if you haven’t seen the
film). So I guess you could say Russell was a pretty good negotiator, really.
References
Cialdini, R. B.,
Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L.
(1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The
door-in-the-face technique. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206–215.
O’Keefe, D. J., & Figge, M. (1999). Guilt and
expected guilt in the door-in-the-face technique. Communication Monographs, 66, 312-324.
Katherine Stevens
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.