Tangled is a more recent Disney movie, which
means that the main characters don’t simply meet and instantly fall in love as
they have in films in past years. First, they have to spend some time together.
Summarizing
the plot so far, Rapunzel has been locked in her tower for her whole life (as
the legend generally goes) but wants to go and see some lanterns that are being
set off into the sky as she feels they mean something to her. In order to do
this, she needs someone to take her, as she has never been outside before.
Meanwhile,
Flynn has stolen the royal princess’s crown, and is hiding in Rapunzel’s tower
from palace guards and the other crown thieves he has cheated. Upon finding a
stranger climbing into her tower, Rapunzel hits him over the back of the head
with a frying pan, hides his satchel containing the crown (she has no idea what
it is), and uses her hair to tie him to a chair as she interrogates him.
When
Flynn wakes up, he instantly asks after his satchel and panics that it’s
missing. As a result, Rapunzel knows that he values it. So, she offers him a deal;
act as her guide, take her to see the lanterns, and return her home safely, in
exchange for the safe return of his satchel and its contents at the end.
Flynn is not
keen on this idea. Not only because it’s going to be a lot of time and effort
for him, but also because he’s just stolen from the King and Queen, so going
back into the heart of the kingdom is a big no-no for him. But then again,
leaving without the crown is also a big no-no for him. His Best Alternative To
a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) is to leave without the satchel, to have all of
the palace guards and his fellow thieves out to get him, and to have to steal
again to earn a living. Rapunzel has therefore narrowed the Zone of Possible
Agreement (ZOPA) because she has power over what he values (the satchel) as she
is the only one who knows where it’s hidden.
Towards the end
of their negotiation, Rapunzel uses the added persuasive technique of repeating
her message. She lets Flynn know 3 times that she never, ever, ever breaks a
promise. Repeating a message is reported to increase believability and
acceptance of communication (Pratkanis, 2007) as it uses the mere exposure effect
(Zajonc, 1968), which operates on the theory that the more you are exposed to
something, the more you will like it. Repeating this point just three times is
more persuasive than repeating it ten times, as high levels of message
repetition result in tedium, whilst moderate levels result in more message
argument scrutiny, so strong messages are more likely to result in persuasion
(Cacioppo & Petty, 1989). Rapunzel’s negotiations must be strong, as Flynn
agrees to her deal.
A large part of
negotiation is knowing when you will walk away; at what point the ZOPA doesn’t
exist and no agreement can be reached. However, having tied him down with her
hair, Rapunzel has actually limited Flynn’s ability to not make a deal and to
walk away from the situation. He won’t be getting out until he agrees with her.
So, in order to be persuasive, make it so that the person you’re persuading is
actually unable to walk away from the deal!
Cacioppo, J.
T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument
processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic
and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 3-12.
Pratkanis, A.
R. (2007). Social influence analysis: An index of tactics. The science of social influence:
Advances and future progress, 17-82.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal
of personality and social psychology, 1-27.
Felicity Ang
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.