In this scene
from The Mummy, Evelyn is negotiating with the warden, in order to save Rick’s
life. She starts yelling amounts of money at him, increasing each time he says
no.
He’s effectively
remaining silent, and not entering into a negotiation. This has been proved to
be an effective tactic (Chu, Strong, Ma & Greene, 2005), as it makes the
other person feel that they need to keep offering. Which is what tends to
happen, and what we see in this scene.
Unfortunately,
even the highest amount doesn’t prevent him from stopping the hanging. However,
Evelyn still has time, as Rick’s neck doesn’t break, so he is left dangling
alive from the rope. She then offers the warden something that she knows he
desperately wants. She lets it slip that Rick has a map that will lead them to
The City of the Dead, where great treasures await them. The position of balance
has now changed. She knows that the warden values the promise of treasure more
than Rick’s life. So, they then start haggling over the percentage of treasure
he will receive.
This is an
example of a contingent concession. The warden can only get the treasure if he
agrees to set Rick free. It utilises the rule of reciprocity, which has been
proven to be a very effective persuasive technique. When someone offers us
something, we feel the need to return the favour (Wax, 2000). In this
situation, both parties can get what they want, (treasure for the Warden and
Rick free for Evelyn), if they agree on a deal.
Because she now
has the power, Evelyn goes straight in with a low percentage. This 10% acts as
an anchor to build the rest of the negotiation around. Orr and Guthrie (2005)
have shown that the outcome of a negotiation positively correlates with the
initial anchor, meaning that people tend to get an offer close to their
original offer. This is exactly what happens in this scene. The warden counters
Evelyn’s 10% with 50%, but quickly agrees to 25%.
The warden then
yells for Rick to be cut down, meaning that Evelyn has achieved her desired
goal. She has saved him thanks to her competent negotiating skills!
References:
Chu, Y., Strong, W. F., Ma, J., & Greene, W. E. (2005). Journal
of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 9, 113-129.
Orr, D., & Guthrie, C. (2005) Anchoring, Information, Expertise, and
Negotiation: New Insights from Meta-Analysis. Ohio State Journal on Dispute
Resolution, 21, 597-612.
Wax, A. L. (2000). Rethinking welfare rights: reciprocity norms,
reactive attitudes, and the political economy of welfare reform. Law
and Contemporary Problems, 63, 257-297.
Zara Heal (Blog 5)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.