Imagine that you are
assigned to be the manager of a new team with unsupportive and lazy employees.
What can you do to motivate them to work harder and re-build a better image for
your team? In order to tackle this problem, you have to think about ways to
change their behaviours: make them to work more and reduce their laziness.
In fact, the key to this
chaotic situation is simple: control employees with the appropriate use of
reinforcement and punishment. There are two types of reinforcement: Positive
reinforcement means that the action is more likely to occur when it is followed
by a favourable outcome; Negative reinforcement means that the action is more
likely to be avoided or removed with the repetitive occurrence of the negative
outcome (Beyer & Trice, 1984). While for punishment, it can reduce
undesirable behaviour by providing unfavourable consequence (Arvey &
Ivancevich, 1980). According to O-Reilly & Puffer (1989), employees are
more satisfied when the supervisors are competent enough to use appropriate
rewards and punishment in managing them, and hence a more cohesive working
environment will be created. So, how can the theories be applied to this
situation?
Managers tend to reward good
performance and punish bad performance. According to O’Reilly and Weitz (1980),
the use of informal or formal warnings and discharges was positively related to
subjects’ performance with the reduction of undesirable behaviour. Taking this
into considerations, managers can combat laziness (bad performance) by
expressions of disapproval or apply cost for certain undesirable behaviour
(punishment). That means, when an employee is late for work, the manager can verbally
criticise (informal warning) them or provide them warning letters (formal
warning). Also, managers can require employees to extend the working hour when
they are late for work (response cost).
On the other hand, managers
can reward behaviours that they want to be repeated. They can acknowledge and praise
the employee in front of the co-workers for the extra workload and excellent
work. Apart from gaining complement from the manager that motivates the
employee, co-workers who witness the complement will be impacted as well.
Regarding social learning theory, the witnessed co-workers may set the
complemented behaviour (extra workload and excellent work) as the model for
evaluation on own performance (Rakestraw & Weiss, 1981). They may therefore
work harder to achieve the standard and in turn raise the morale among the
employees. Likewise, managers can set up bonus system as for financial rewards
and fill in good reports for employees’ promotion use.
However, one thing to be
noted is that reinforcements and punishments should be used with correct
manner. The rewards or punishments should be followed by the behaviour consistently
and immediately in order to maximise its effectiveness and minimise confusion.
Otherwise, respondents may be unable to learn the association between the
behaviour and respective rewards or punishments.
All in all, being a
successful manager in leading a team and creating a cohesive working
environment is not as difficult as you thought. It is simply about applying the
appropriate methods in changing and controlling behaviours- grab the right key
to the corresponding door.
Reference:
Arvey, R. D. &
Ivancevich, J. A. (1980). Punishment in Organisations: A Review, Propositions,
and Research Suggestions. The Academy of Management Review, 5, 123-132.
Beyer, J. M. & Trice, H.
M. (1984). A Field Study of the Use and Perceived Effects of Discipline in
Controlling Work Performance. The Academy
of Management Journal, 27, 743-764.
O’Reilly, C. A. &
Puffer, S. M. (1989). The Impact of Rewards and Punishments in a Social
Context: A Laboratory and Field Experiment. Journal
of Occupational Psychology, 62, 41-53.
O’Reilly, C. A. & Weitz,
B. A. (1980). Managing Marginal Employees: The Use of Warnings and Dimissals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 467-484.
Rakestraw, T. & Weiss,
H. (1981). The Interaction of Social Influences and Task Experiences on Goals,
Performance, and Performance Satisfaction. Organisational
Behaviour and Human Performance, 27, 326-344.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.