Would you pay £5000 to have pictures taken for a modelling
portfolio? Probably not. But what if someone approached you at a shopping
centre and told you that you had what it took to be a model, and for only £50
you could secure a place on a photo shoot? The following persuasion techniques
are used to get aspiring models to pay large amounts to get their career
started.
Flattery
The “talent scout” approaches the target and tells them that
they have modelling potential. Complementing people makes them more likely to
comply with your next request (Goodall et al., 1996).
Sunk Costs
The targets are invited to a photo shoot to build their
portfolio and they are asked to pay a deposit (which they are assured will be
refunded after attending the shoot). Once they have travelled to the shoot,
they are made to wait for hours before the shoot starts. When people have
invested time and money into something, they are more likely to continue
spending time and money on it, as they don’t want to waste the resources that
they have already put in (Arkes & Blumer, 1985).
Low balling
The target may already be aware that they will have to pay
for the photos, but it is only after the shoot that they are told how expensive
they are: prices start in the hundreds and go into the thousands. This technique
is called low-balling and it works because the person has already committed to
buying the product when the terms are changed (Burger & Cornelius, 2003).
Time pressure
To add extra pressure, they are told that their photos will
be deleted immediately (with an excuse like data protection laws) so if they
don’t agree to pay immediately, they will lose the chance forever. Under time
pressure, people panic and do not have a chance to think through properly
(Cialdini, 2009).
For more information see:
https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0071-look-out-modeling-scams
References
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of
sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
Burger, J. M., & Cornelius, T. (2003). Raising the price
of agreement: Public commitment and the lowball compliance procedure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33,
923-934.
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice.
Boston: Pearson Education.
Goodall, J., Ilustre, I., Marquis, C., Nicolella, N., &
Sikaitis, J. (1996). Effects of Flattery in Obtaining Compliance. The Sloping Halls Review, 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.