I was walking to the railway station when I happened to
glance up at the billboard and I was disappointed with what I saw. In the
advertisement, we see a plumber, smiling happily at the
camera, holding up his tablet with a picture of a tap. The caption
‘business is flowing now customers find me online’ uses a pun to convey the
concept that by having a website, your business will thrive.
Apart from the slightly unclear objective of this governmental campaign (which
I assume is to encourage small businesses to invest in a website), the advert
doesn't excite or particularly make the viewer want to find out anything more
about the campaign. Although they have attempted to use the concept of 'just
plain folk' to convey their message, I think other techniques may have been more
successful.
I propose that a more successful approach would be to use
someone with a high status in business. Miller and Baseheart (1969) explored
the persuasiveness of a message, depending on the source trustworthiness.
Participants were assigned either to the high trustworthiness (former President
Eisenhower) or low trustworthiness (former American Nazi Party leader, George
Lincoln Rockwell) condition. Each participant read the same messages,
which were 4 opinionated and non-opinionated statements. Each opinion statement
was introduced with a paragraph identifying it as an excerpt from a recent
press conference on the topic of physical fitness. Depending on trustworthiness
condition, each opinion was attributed to one of the 2 sources mention above. After reading the statement, each participant indicated their attitude towards making the sale of cigarettes illegal.
Table 1 summarises the findings from the study. Results indicate
that when the trustworthiness of the source was deemed as high, attitude change
was more likely to occur since this produced a larger overall change in
attitude (demonstrated by the larger score in the ‘change’ column). For
example, high levels of trustworthiness, coupled with an opinionated statement,
that was presented in a close minded way, achieved an attitude change of -5.26,
compared with the same condition but low trustworthiness of the source, which
only achieved a change in attitude of 3.83 (non-significant). The study found
that those participants who read statements from a highly trustworthy source
were far more likely to state that cigarettes should be made illegal than those
participants who read the statement from a low trustworthy source.
Overall it is clear that the use of a highly trustworthy messenger
is an effective persuasive strategy. The government could re-design their
advert to use someone like Alan Sugar or another popular business person,
someone who is viewed as trustworthy, to demonstrate to viewers that setting
up a website is a good investment and a safe thing to do. This, in turn could allow the audience to
imagine how impressive their business could become by investing online.
Similarly using someone who has created a successful business demonstrates to
the audience that the person knows what they are talking about compared with the plumber, who appears to be doing well currently, although he is unlikely to know much about business in general...
Miller, G.R., & Baseheart, J. (1969). Source trustworthiness, opinionated statements, and response to persuasive communication. Speech Monographs, 36, 1-7.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.