According to Goldenburg, Mazursky and Solomon (1999), there are six
fundamental templates to good quality advertising; one of these templates is
the competition template. The researchers described the competition template as
an advertising pattern to portray situations in which a product is subjected to
competition with another product or event from a different class.
A good example of a competition template is evident in the advertisement
above, where the Internet speed of an EPhone900 is directly compared to the
speed of a snake ready to strike. The way the picture of the snake is opening
its mouth threateningly makes the viewers panic, whilst on the other hand, the
human casually searches “How to dodge a snakebite?” in the Google search bar on
the new technology (at the time). The casualty portrayed of being able to
search methods to protect yourself from a snake ready to attack you seems to
slow down time.
Once the advertisement captivates its viewers with a little humour from
the unique and indirect juxtaposition, it shows a caption that says “Fast
Internet access when and where you need it. EPhone 900.” This statement
clarifies the main message of the advertisement: EPhone 900 allows the
consumers of the product to have an Internet access so fast that they could
look up how to dodge a snakebite even before the snake could strike!
Goldenburg, Mazursky and Solomon (1999) reported three versions of the
competition template: The attribute in competition version, the worth in
competition version and the uncommon use version. This particular advertisement
uses the attribute in competition version of the template, as the product (EPhone
900) competes against an object (the snake), which is known for the same
attribute, i.e. being fast.
Reference:
Goldenberg,
J., Mazursky, D. et al. (1999). The fundamental templates of quality ads. Marketing
Science, 333-351.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.