The commercial advertisement above uses persuasive technique
like ‘flattery’ to promote the electronic cigarette. Rather than increasing
sales an advert such as this is more likely to result in reduced revenue and
worsened brand image because many people have complained about the content used
in this ad. These consequences are supported by Hendrick, Borden, Giesen,
Murray, and Seyfried (1972). They found that
flattery increased compliance with a request to complete a seven-page
questionnaire relative to a control condition.
This advertisement could be improved by using the
combination of persuasive techniques such as vivid appeals, image contrast and the
negativity effect. Nisbett and Ross (1980) suggests that a vivid appeal is a
message that is '' (a) emotionally interesting, (b) concrete and image-provoking,
(c) immediate’’. According to Kanouse and Hanson (1972), negative information
receives more attention and weight than positive information when making
judgements about persons, issues and things. For example, making comparisons of
vivid after images of people’s lungs after having normal cigarettes and electronic
cigarettes might be a more persuasive promotion campaign for the electronic
cigarettes.
Hodges (1974) conducted a study whereby participants were
given three different personality descriptors varying in the amount of positive
and negative information (with only favourable traits (PP), with favourable and
unfavourable traits (PN) and with only unfavourable traits (NN)). The results
(shown in diagram below) suggest that the more unfavourable the trait is, the
more weight it takes. In other words, the negative information has a greater
influence in evaluation.
Therefore, if the electronic cigarette company would change
their promotion campaign into image contrast this may increase people’s
awareness of the electronic cigarettes as these maybe the better choice for
smokers in terms of health issues.
Reference
Hendrick, C.,
Borden, R., Giesen, M., Murray, E, J., & Seyfried, B, A. (1972).
Effectiveness of ingratiation tactics in a cover letter on mail questionnaire
response. Psychodynamic Science, 26, 349-351.
Hodges, B. H.
(1974). Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation.Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 30, 378-381.
Kanouse, D.
E., & Hansom, L, R. (1972). Negativity in evaluations. In E.E. Jones, D.E.
Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution Perceiving the causes of
behaviour. Morristown, NJ: General
Learning Press.
Nisbett,
R.E., & Loss, L. (1980). Human
inference: Strategies and short comings of social judgement. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.