This
advert is raising awareness of the importance of wearing a seatbelt. It shows
an ordinary man, Richard, who is driving along minding his own business, but
not wearing his seatbelt. Immediately the voiceover says “Richard didn’t want
to die, but he couldn’t stop himself”. It goes on to show Richard’s car
crashing into another car coming in the opposite direction, which the advert
explains is not actually the reason for his death. We are told that the reason Richard
died was because he was not wearing a seatbelt. The advert then goes on to
detail the graphic consequences of not wearing your seatbelt when you get into
a car crash.
This
advert had made use of the “Consequences Template” outlines by Goldenberg,
Mazursky and Solomon (1999). This template has two versions – the extreme
consequences version whereby the consequences of an action shown in the message
are taken to the extreme. However this advert has used the inverted
consequences version, warning against the consequences of not following the
recommendation in the advert.
This
advert is an example of the inverted consequences template because it is warning
viewers against the consequences of not following the recommendation to wear
your seatbelt. Namely, that rather than being able to fix your car and get on
with your life as you would have been able to if you had followed the advert’s
advice, you will end up severely injured if not dead if you do not wear a
seatbelt.
Goldenberg,
J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). The fundamental template of quality
ads. Marketing Science, 18(3),
333-351.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.