Behaviour Change

PROPAGANDA FOR CHANGE is a project created by the students of Behaviour Change (ps359) and Professor Thomas Hills at the Psychology Department of the University of Warwick. This work was supported by funding from Warwick's Institute for Advanced Teaching and Learning.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Liberal Democrats - 1997


In this party political broadcast, promoting the Liberal Democrats in the run up to the 1997 general election, John Cleese explains that he, and the liberal democrats have a problem. He goes on to explain that the problem is not to do with the policies of the party or its leader, explaining that people agree with them. In doing this he links the advertisement to peoples existing beliefs, Cacioppo, Petty and Sidera (1982) demonstrated that persuasive messages based on religious or legal arguments that subjects were already oriented towards were more effective than messages that were not.

He then goes on to look at some possible reasons that people may not vote for the lib dems, and refutes them, for example 'is it that you don;t think the lib dems have enough experience running things?' which he the refuted; 'i don't think so, not while we a running far more local authorities than the tories.'

At the end of the broadcast he asks the audience to write down what they would say to convince people that they can do what they would really like to do (ie vote for the lib dems). This uses the technique of self-generated persuasion  Self generated persuasion was shown to be a successful form of persuasion by Lewin (1947) who found that housewives who were asked to generate their own arguments about why serving sweetbreads was a good thing were eleven times more likely to serve them than women who were given a lecture on the subject.

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Sidera, J. (1982). The effects of a salient self-schema on the evaluation of proattitudinal editorials: Top-down versus bottom-up message processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 18, 324-388.
Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (EDS>), Readings in social psychology (pp.223-235). New York: Holt.

1 comment:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.