In this campaign, Dyson attempts to sell their range of
vacuum cleaners, using at first what appear to be controversial statements in
their advertisements to catch attention. The Large font causes people to first
notice the ‘controversial statement’ and then finish reading the advert to
understand that the message is not controversial, but in fact quite funny and
positive. Research by Huhmann and Mott-Stenerson (2008) looked at the effect of
controversial appeals on elaborative processing and brand message comprehension.
The results found that controversial advertisement executions increase
elaboration regardless of the levels of product involvement.
The company used
witty, self-deprecating humour by focusing on how context can change the
meaning of their statements. Without
context the slogan ‘This Thing SUCKS’ would be viewed in a negative light and
be considered a poor product. However, Dyson has cleverly realised that in the
context of vacuum cleaners, the same statement is suddenly positive and speaks of how
good the product is. Greengross and Miller (2008) looked at the effects of
self-deprecating humour in a study with Sixty-four female
and 32 male college student. Each participant listened to recordings of
opposite-sex people who were described as having different levels of status,
and who produced different types humor. They found that self-deprecating humor by
high-status presenters (but not low-status presenters) increased long-term
attractiveness for both sexes. Relating this back to Dyson, a quite well-known
brand that people already associate with good quality, effectively uses this
type of self-deprecating humor and makes them seem more attractive through a
kind of failed modesty that is humorous in its wordplay.
Greengross,
G. & Miller, G. F., (2008). Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects
of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness
of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3),
393-408.
Huhmann,
B. A. & Mott-Stenerson, B., (2008). Controversial advertisement executions
and involvement on elaborative processing and comprehension. Journal of
Marketing Communications, 14(4), 293-313.
Nice. Now should I be more or less self-deprecating?
ReplyDelete