Water is life: #firstworldproblems
This advertisement by ‘water is life’ was used to encourage
the audience to donate money by promoting the importance of water shortage problems
in third world countries. It combines social media strategy (hash tagging on
twitter) with a serious message by showing a number of Haitians saying twitter
quotes about first world problems, whilst being surrounded by scenery showing that
they live in poverty. This emphasises the huge division between first and third
world living conditions. The irony puts into perspective how unimportant first
world problems are in comparison. This will evoke guilt in the viewer because
they can probably relate to a number of the ‘first world problems’ mentioned in
the advert.
The main persuasive technique used is guilt. It influences
the audience by causing inconsistencies between standards and actions (Pfau
& Dillard, 2002), therefore, increasing cognitive dissonance. In order to
reduce these feelings of guilt, viewers are easily persuaded by the solutions
offered in the advert (donating money).
The effectiveness of guilt is demonstrated in a study by
Pinto and Priest (1991). They used results from a content analysis of womens magazines to create advertisements with differing levels of guilt: low, medium and high. Working mothers were shown five adverts about a microwaveable dinner product, each one inducing a different level of guilt by explaining the unhealthy effects that can occur from eating microwaveable dinners. They then used an interview to measure participants guilt and purchase behaviour. The results showed a curvilinear relationship: the intensity of the guilt appeal effects the level of guilt aroused. Thus, medium guilt appeals are the most
effective at evoking guilt in the audience, and high levels of guilt can have a
negative effect, causing anger, which decreases the effectiveness of the
advert. Bozinoff and Ghingold (1983) also found that moderate guilt positively
affects behaviour. This could be a reason why this advert has a more striking
effect compared to standard water aid adverts: it does not aggressively put
forward the message or create high levels of guilt.
Additionally, the advert employs the
dependency-responsibility altercast to increase audience compliance. At the end
of the advert, it states ‘first world problems are not problems, a donation can
help bring clean water to those in need’. This emphasises that the viewer has
responsibility and can make a difference. A donation would enable to water aid
to be given and relieve suffering.
It also uses multiple sources by including a number of
different Haitians hash tagging the first world problems. This has a persuasive
effect as it suggests that the whole community is affected.
References:
Bozinoff, L., & Ghingold, M. (1983). Evaluating guilt
arousing marketing communications. J Bus
Res, 11, 243–55.
Pfau, M., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice.
London, England. Sage Publications.
Pinto, M. B., & Priest, S. (1991). Guilt appeals in
advertising: an explanatory study. Psychological
Reports, 69, 375-385.
Pratkanis, A. R. (2007). The science of social influence: Advances and future progress. New York:
Psychology Press.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete