The Sword
from Game of Thrones: A Hamilton Real State’s Case
“Value is whatever people find
useful or desirable” (Malhotra & Bazerman, 2007). This statement gives us
the first issue to take into account when referring to negotiation. In any
persuasive conversation, you can find common elements that create the deal: Al
least two parties, an object of negotiation, a price and conditions of the
contract (Kennedy, 2007).
In a typical contract “the basic
goal is getting the best possible deal for yourself”. This is what Malhotra and
Bazerman show us in their “Negotiation Genius” through the example of Hamilton
real State. In this situation, you lead a holding company, Pear Investments,
specialized in real-estate investments, which posses a territory in the town of
Hamilton. The main circumstances are the following: There are more companies
interested in buying the property for residential use for law reasons, you can
get almost twice the price if the final use is commercial and the best offer
you have so far is the one made by Quincy Developments for $38 millions. Later
on, another premier-state company, State One, shows interest in the property
for building luxury condominiums. You this offer could increase the price of
the property even in a 20%, and that you could increase the other one in a
10-15% at most. This is when you have to take your options and think carefully
about the deal: what words to use for each company, choose the correct moment
to make your move and so on.
In this example from the TV series “The
Big Bang Theory”, a similar situation can be seen. There’s a potential buyer (Leonard
and Sheldon) and the seller man, Stuart. The combination of knowledge Leonard
has about selling rates of Stuart, the product to be sold and the relation between
them makes Leonard being in advantage, even with Sheldon’s complete ignorance
about negotiation world. When Stuart first asks about their interest on the
sword, Leonard lets him see less than half of the opinion they have about it,
keeping from him to know they could pay anything for it, despite that’s the
real truth. Then he asks for the price, and makes Stuart know that the price he
poses is still too high, and then he starts haggling. When he sees that that is
working he tries to take advantage on the fact that they are most potential
buyers of that sword and that Stuart is desperate for selling it and tries to “add
the helmet to the basket”. Stuart does not accept that proposition, but that
makes him see the preceding offer as a better one (the best alternative to
negotiated agreement for Leonard and Sheldon, this is, their BATNA), finally
selling the sword for 210$, 40$ less than the first established price, even
with the “friends and family discount”. Even when the object was not a very
special one, Leonard and Sheldon got it for the cheapest price they could have done.
References
Kennedy, G.
(2007) Strategic Negotiation (pp. 31-40) Great Britain, UK: Gower
.
Malhotra, D
& Bazerman, M. H. (2007) Negotiation Genius (pp. 15-24) New York, USA:
Bantam
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.