“… If we can stand up
to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into
broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the
United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into
the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by
the lights of perverted science. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our
duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth
last for a thousand years, men will still say, "This was their finest
hour."”
This famous speech by Churchill in the summer of 1940 has
become iconic when we look back to our history.
It was his speeches that encouraged a nation to continue in their
efforts and ultimately defeat Hitler. He effectively turns the present battle
into a memory of the past; a memory in where we have won. It is clear from the audio and transcripts that
his aim was not to convey the truth but persuade a nation.
In this particular segment, Churchill is exploiting a two-sided
refutation message. Above, in the first
few lines he highlights the dark consequences of failing. By using ‘ifs’ he is
providing the audience with a subtle choice.
However, this provision of an alternative is an illusion and it is this
same use of ‘ifs’ that lead the audience to understand that winning is attainable. By telling the audience what they are going
to do (‘let us’) and the heroism that will come from it he is ascertaining the
shame that will come if individuals don’t do their part.
From his vigorous argument, he successfully counters the
other side and in reality does not give the alternative of opting out of the
battle instead, he effectively precludes to one choice; ‘fight’.
In a meta-analysis by Allen (1991) the use of technique was shown
to be most effective when the counter argument was refuted. Churchill, as seen above, implicitly belittles
any plausibility of a counter argument. He
also is able to advantageously use an audience that is already well informed
and is able to process the message.
Reference:
Allen, M. (1991). Meta‐analysis comparing the persuasiveness of
one‐sided and two‐sided messages. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 390-404.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.