This provocative advertisement
was created for car manufacturing giant BMW in 2008 as part of their used-car
marketing campaign. The image features
an attractive, youthful female model with a seductive pout and reads “You know
you’re not the first. But do you really
care?”. The advert was withdrawn after an outbreak of fury among the public and
vast amount of negative media attention surrounding the advertisement.
However, the ingredients that
went into the creation of this advert suggest that it should have been a
success rather than failure. Research by Smith and Engel (1968) investigated
the impact of a physically attractive model in advertising on a person’s
perception of automobiles. They found
that participants rated the automobiles more highly dependent on the
attractiveness of the model; rating the cars as more appealing, faster and of
higher quality, among other positive attributes. Interestingly this effect was not just seen
among men, but also women. When
considering this research alone, it would be of no surprise that BMW chose to
use 'sex appeal' to sell their cars.
The advertisement utilises a
literary device as its only text content to persuade the viewer by asking a rhetorical
question. Ahluwalia and Burnkrant (2004) proposed a model of the effects of
rhetorical questions and suggested that they are successful in drawing
attention to the source of a message, in this case, BMW’s used cars. This advertisement however assumes that men
(the obvious primary target audience) would not refuse this woman’s irresistible
sexual advances. The suggestive message behind the ad would undoubtedly be seen
as offensive to many members of the general public, therefore it is not surprising
that the ad sparked a large amount of controversy.
It could also be debated that the
consistency rule is linked to this advertisement, making the audience consider
buying a used car by implying that they would not be put off by a ‘used’ woman,
as the ad denotes. General social
influence research suggests that we strive to act in a consistent way as this
is highly desirable in society. This research advocates that perhaps more
people would buy BMW’s used cars as they desire their actions to be consistent
with their beliefs, effectively attempting to draw a parallel between promiscuity
with ‘used’ women and buying used cars. The consistency tool also works to
increase familiarity, whereby many people viewing this ad will feel that they
can relate to it, producing a more memorable advertisement and influencing
people to buy the cars.
So how smart were BMW with
producing such a shocking advertisement? Did they consider that this
advertisement would effectively eliminate the majority of the female market due
to such blatant sexism and degrading objectification of women? Or is this perhaps a clever marketing
strategy using shock tactics to gain attention?
Rachel Stirling
Ahluwalia, R. & Burnkrant, R.
E. (2004). Persuasion knowledge perspective for understanding the effects of
rhetorical questions. Journal of Consumer
Research, 31, 26-42.
Smith, G. & Engel, R. (1968).
Influence of a female model on perceived characteristics of an automobile. Proceedings of the 76th Annual
Convention of the American Psychological Association, 3, 681-682.
Good, i particularly like you argument for consistency.
ReplyDelete