This advert,
created in 2012, rides on the hype of the London Olympics. It is part of a
government campaign designed to encourage people to drink milk as part of a
healthy diet. It depicts Jade Jones,
Laura Trott and Nicola Adams who won gold medals in Taekwondo, cycling and
boxing respectively. I personally hate milk but let’s see if I can be persuaded
otherwise!
The advert uses
two of Cialdini’s (1984) principles of advertising; liking and authority.
Liking of the sportswomen depicted is induced via the modes of contact and
cooperation. Contact or familiarity was found by Zajonc (1968) to increase
positive attitudes towards a person or object in what he coined ‘the mere
exposure effect’. He demonstrated this in various tasks including asking
participants to view various Chinese characters and then getting them to decide
whether they meant positive or negative adjectives. They were more likely to
guess positive if they had seen the character frequently before. This advert uses
celebrities to create the feeling of familiarity. We have seen their faces
around a lot, especially in the climate of the Olympics and as a result, we are
more likely to view them favourably and consequently be persuaded by them.
The second
mode of liking, cooperation, sees the advert capitalise on the ‘Olympic spirit’
in Britain at the time of the games. We saw everyone come together and support the
country with the shared goal of Olympic gold medals. Cooperation increases
liking, as demonstrated by Sherif and Sherif (1953) in their summer camp study.
They showed that when two conflicting groups of boys had to work together to
push their bus back to the camp, they got on better and conflict was reduced.
The other of
Cialdini’s (1984) principles used is authority. He suggests that we are more
likely to be persuaded by someone if they hold some authority over us. Here
authority has been elicited in two ways. The first is their expert knowledge.
If someone has achieved a gold medal in their sport then you know they are an
expert. For example; Hofling and colleagues (1966) demonstrated that simply the
title ‘Dr’ made nurses blindly follow instructions under the belief a Doctor is
more knowledgeable than them. Secondly, uniforms create a sense of authority.
For example, Jade Jones’ Black belt clearly suggests her superiority. Uniforms alone can increase persuasion as was
demonstrated by Bickman (1974). People in the street were more likely to comply
with the requests of the same man if he was dressed as a guard compared to when
he was dressed as a milkman or civilian. I can certainly relate to this myself.
I do Taekwondo and the mere mention of a black belt, without fail, provokes the
response; “Oh, I better be nice to you then!” as if I am some crazy, unstable
maniac! So come to think about it, maybe not the effect that the advertisers
were going for.
Humour is
another technique used in this advert to persuade the vitamin deficient reader
to have a glass of milk. The moustache on top of their upper lip, I personally
found comical. This is a common persuasive technique used in advertising (well,
not the tash specifically). However a recent review by Weinberger and Gulas
(1992) suggests that humour is not more effective than non-humour at persuading
directly. However, an element of humour attracts attention and can increase
liking for the product. Through these two avenues, a humorous addition can
facilitate persuasion.
Furthermore, Goldenberg and colleagues (1999) posit that effectively
persuasive adverts use a creativity template. This advert uses the completion
template meaning that it depicts the product beating other similar products. In
other words, this advert attempts to insinuate that the drinking of milk has
led the competitors to win gold in their respective sports, thereby beating all
the inferior athletes who had toast for breakfast. Ironically I still hate
milk, but none the less, an effective advert.
Robyn
Wootton
Bickman, L.
(1974). The Social Power of a Uniform. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 4, 47-61.
Cialdini, R.
B. (1984). The psychology of persuasion. New York: Quill William Morrow.
Goldenberg,
J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). The fundamental templates of
quality ads. Marketing Science, 18, 333-351.
Sherif, M.,
& Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension; an integration of
studies of intergroup relations. Oxford: Harper & Brothers.
Weinberger,
M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (1992). The impact of humor in advertising: A
review. Journal of Advertising, 21, 35-59.
Zajonc, R.
B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality
and social psychology, 9, 1-27.
Good analysis Robyn, Id also say that association played some part.
ReplyDelete