Converse is an American shoe company that bases its
advertisement not solely on shoes themselves but on the lifestyle that comes
with it. Converse generally targets young adults between the ages of 18-24
years and has a huge appeal for skateboarders and the “alternative scene” whom its advertisements are generally aimed at.
This poster for converse is very much targeted at a distinct
group of individuals, portraying the shoes as worn by “gig-goers” and
“party-people”. Targeted advertisements work so well as they resonate with
characteristics that are viewed as desirable or meaningful to the intended
audiences. Research on persuasion has resounded with multiple support that any
factor that leads viewers to make judgements of similarity between themselves
and the source of the advertising (in this case, the alternative bunch in the
poster) enhances positive response to the advertisement (Mackie et al 1990).
Markets often look for meaningful characteristics by which
to divide a single heterogeneous market into separate consumer segments that
may be courted more effectively (and this is exactly what converse have done).
Distinctiveness theory was developed by McGuire in the 1970’s but has only been
applied to marketing since the 1990’s. It is based on the idea that people
define themselves by traits that are numerically rare in their local
environment; in this case, the alternative scene. Research has found that
members of these distinct groups attend more to targeted advertisements and
favour them more strongly compared to their non-targeted counterparts
(Deshpande et al 1994).
By targeting a specific subculture converse has, rather than
narrowing their client base, encouraged this already existing social structure
to associate the shoes with themselves. Wearing converse is a statement; that
you are cool, that you’re a rebel. However therein lies the humour of the whole
situation. By buying shoes targeted directly at you for being a rebel, how
rebellious are you actually being?
Alice Susan Owen
References:
Deshpandé, Rohit & Stayman, D. (1994). A Tale of Two
Cities: Distinctiveness Theory and
Advertising Effectiveness, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 57-64.
Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990).
Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology,
58, 812–822.
McGuire, W. J., Padawer, S. A. (1976). Trait salience and
the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 743-754.
Excellently written!
ReplyDelete