Disney land. The realm of adventure, fun
and fairy tales. The concept that I have in my head of Disneyland has long been
there, cultivated by stories that I have heard, my own experiences, and of course,
the adverts. Typically an advert for Disneyland features a young child waking
up to be told that they are off to the land where dreams come true, and then
the advert ends on a zoomed in shot of their wonder-filled face. However these new(ish) adverts are a little
bit different. This advertising campaign features a variety of celebrities all
posing as a range of Disney characters. There’s pop-singer Taylor Swift as
Rapunzel, footballer David Beckham as a generic Prince Charming and Beyoncé as
Alice in Wonderland to name a few.
The photographs are beautifully shot by
famous photographer Annie Leibovitz and the images are clear and vivid.
Gonzalez et al (1988) demonstrated that vivid imagery can be a helpful tool
when trying to sell a product. They found that when salesmen presented vivid descriptions
of the product to their customers, then they were more likely to buy it. These
adverts work on the same principle, as they present highly vivid images to
their customers, which will hopefully lead to them going to the parks to
experience their version of the vivid image, in this case, the ‘adventure’ or
the feeling of being a princess. In these adverts, the vivid imagery technique
has the added benefit of making the individual picture their own fairytale,
which means that the advert is perfectly tailored towards them without Disney
actually having to put any extra work into the advertising.
However it is not only the photograph that
is working to sell the product in these adverts. The small tag lines use the
idea that ‘imagery sells’ to promote the product. They use words such as
‘adventure’, ‘imagination’ and ‘destiny’; all words which conjure certain
images in people’s heads. Gregory et al (1982) found that subjects who were
‘led to imagine themselves experiencing certain events came to believe more
strongly that the events would befall them’. So, in terms of these adverts, by
bringing these images to mind, the observer is more likely to go to Disney land
to experience these feelings once they have been put into their head.
An obvious technique that the adverts use
is their utilisation of celebrities. Each advert in the campaign features at
least one celebrity, if not two or three. This demonstrates the ‘high
status-admirer altercast’ as put forward by Pratkanis (2007). The altercast suggests that people admire
those that are high-status, and want to be like them. In order to do this they
try to replicate what they do or have, in this case it means that they would
visit the Disney Parks. The use of celebrities also promotes the idea of
associative casting, that ‘there is a relationship between an individual’s
attraction to a socially distant reference group [the celebrity] and the amount
of influence that the group exerts’ (Cocanougher & Bruce, 1971). By placing the celebrities into the advert,
Disney are trying to influence their fans into going to the parks.
Finally, Disney are using metaphors to make
their parks attractive to their customers. This concept was put forward by
Sopory and Dillard (2002); In this case, the metaphor is the photograph being
used, whether it is of Alice in Wonderland, Prince Charming or any of the
characters. The metaphor here aligns the idea of living the dream and adventure
of the stories with the Disney Parks (the product). By aligning these two
ideas, the advert suggests to the customer that they are one and the same, making
the customer want to experience the 'adventure' of the parks for themselves.
References.
Cocanougher, A. B., & Bruce, G. D. (1971). Socially distant
reference groups and consumer aspirations. Journal of Marketing Research,
8(3), 379-381.
Gonzales, M. H., Aronson, E., & Costanzo, M. A. (1988).
Using Social Cognition and Persuasion to Promote Energy Conservation: A Quasi‐Experiment1. Journal
of Applied Social Psychology, 18(12), 1049-1066.
Gregory, W. L., Cialdini, R. B., & Carpenter, K. M. (1982).
Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance:
Does imagining make it so?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
43(1), 89.
Pratkanis, A. R. (Ed.). (2007). Social influence analysis: An
index of tactics. The Science of Social Influence: Advances and future
progress. New York: Psychology Press.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects
of metaphor: a meta‐analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3),
382-419.
Found content 2 - By
Lucy Berkeley
Good analysis Lucy.
ReplyDelete