To some, this blog may seem inconceivable to write after
watching a gorgeous man over and over on a loop. Try as I might to see what
techniques the advertisers used, I, like many other women got sucked in and
didn’t even listen to the words coming out of his mouth. Eventually, after
about fifteen, sixteen, or thirty two views I managed to see just how incredibly
clever this advert is. It appeals to both sexes, for completely different
reasons. I as a female, wish that all guys looked and smelt like this god (even
though I don’t actually get the remotest whiff) and my male friend said, “yeah I’d
buy that to smell buff and get the ladies”- if you’re saying ‘buff’ it probably
won’t happen regardless of what you smell like.
So what do they do to get us so engaged and what on earth
did they do to get me to see past those horrendous white trousers?
Let’s first of all look at contrast. We are sat there either
as a woman; with a fairly plain, unexciting specimen that we call our ‘boyfriend’
or we are a man sat eating a ridiculous amount of chicken, or a two-for-Tuesday’s
deal all to ourselves (every season is bulking season). If we are looking at
this side of the TV, compared with what is inside the TV, there is no question
that both the woman and the man would rather be looking ‘god-like’ on a boat.
They get us thinking that smelling good will get us far in life, and bring
riches along with it. Tormala & Petty, 2007 found that the advantage to
using this trick is that it is undetectable. We naturally feel stronger
feelings towards something that is subjectively good, after we are exposed to
what can be subjectively mundane.
The use of social proof is so prominent within this
advertisement. The idea of ‘the man your man could smell like’ automatically
creates a case for the ‘right way to be’. Men will look at this advert, just
like my male friend and think, “Well I want that if it makes me appealing”, or
the girls will think “I want my man like him”. Seems fairly naïve, but it is a
human trait to strive to be the best we can be (Maslow, 1943). Salesmen know
that to spice up their pitches, they must show an individual who has purchased
the product, in this case an attractive male (Cialdini, 2007). Parks, Sanna & Berel (2001) said
that we will decide what behaviour to carry out especially when looking at
someone similar to ourselves. Whilst most of us will not be similar to ‘King
Gorge’ on the screen, could we argue that a huge part of our buying behaviour
is related to what we want to be, and what we deem to be attractive? He is just so cool.
But for me what it comes down to is humour, an incredible
technique used day to day to get us to do things. The little bit right at the end "I'm on a horse" is funny due to sheer randomness and makes it highly memorable. When searching for this advert on youtube, 'old spice I'm on a horse' comes up in the suggestions. Make us laugh, we instantly
feel more positive (Lyubomirsky, King & Diener, 2005). I’m guilty of being
in a shop sometimes and debating over a product, “ah well, the advert made me
laugh” boom: in the trolley. This advert is a piece of influential genius, it’s
memorable, engaging and humorous, much like this blog I would like to think.
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of Persuasion. New York: HarperCollins
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The
benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131.
. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–96.
Parks, C. D., Sanna, L. J., & Berel, S. R. (2001). Actions of similar others as inducements to cooperate in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 345-354.
Tormala, Z.L., & Petty, R.E. (2007). Contextual contrast and perceived knowledge: Exploring the implications for persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 17-30.
Amber Kalejs
Tormala, Z.L., & Petty, R.E. (2007). Contextual contrast and perceived knowledge: Exploring the implications for persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 17-30.
Amber Kalejs
Good, your writing is flirting with being too informal with too many jokes, but I happen to like it. Next time make stronger links with the science.
ReplyDelete