This
advert promoting ‘Veet for Men’ is a clear example of the ‘innudendo’ social
influence tactic, hinting at the reception of sexual attention from others upon
using the product. The topless man, with his Men’s health-worthy physique
coupled with the tagline, “This’ll put hands on your chest” leads men to
believe that the result of using the hair-removal cream 'Veet' makes them come
across as more desirable.
Wegner found that the tactic of innuendo was
very powerful, with people often basing their impressions on the innuendo
statements. Wegner, Wenzlaff, Kerker, and Beattie (1981) showed
participants of their study varied newspaper headlines that conveyed damaging
information about people in four ways:
1.
Direct incriminating statements (e.g., "Bob Talbert Linked with
Mafia")
2.
Incriminating questions (e.g., "Is Bob Talbert Linked with Mafia?")
3.
Incriminating denials (e.g., "Bob Talbert Not Linked with Mafia")
4.
Neutral headlines included for comparison (e.g., "Bob Talbert Arrives in
City")
When
assessed, subjects of the study showed that the innuendo of Bob’s dealings with
the Mafia was effective- those shown the incriminating headlines were more
likely to have a negative impression of him as opposed to those who were shown
neutral headlines.
Sengupta
and Dahl (2008) found that men on average will
exhibit a more positive attitudinal response to gratuitous sex appeals than
women under conditions of high-cognitive loads, when a gut-level response is
required. Thus in this case, working upon the idea that sex sells, one can
conclude that innuendos are a useful marketing tool to draw attention to the
product.
Furthermore,
humour by association has been found to have a positive effect on
attention (Weinberger and Gulas). Speck conducted a test comparing
humorous ads to non-humorous controls on four measures: initial, sustained,
projected and overall attention. He found humorous ads to be more successful on
all measures. Although Weinberger found that a mere 26% of practitioners
believe humour to be more persuasive, it is guaranteed to hold the consumer’s
attention for longer.
-
Daniel H. Wegner (1984) ,"Innuendo and Damage to Reputations", in NA
- Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11, eds.
Thomas C. Kinnear, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages:
694-696.
- Weinberger, Mark G. and Charles S. Gulas.
"The Impact of Humour in Advertising: A Review." Journal of Advertising (1992): 35-58.
Interesting. Thanks.
ReplyDelete