Unlike some people, Belvedere always goes down smoothly.
Belvedere posted this advert on their social media sites in
2012. However, the advert was removed within hours of being published due to a
number of complaints about it promoting rape culture. Belvedere issued an
apology and even made a donation to RAINN (America’s largest anti-sexual
violence organisation), which clearly shows that they realised the
inappropriate nature of the advert.
The advert shows a man restraining a woman who is clearly
frightened by the situation. It is accompanied by the slogan ‘unlike some
people, Belvedere always goes down smoothly’. The intended meaning of the
advert was to suggest that Belvedere shocks people, as it is a high quality and
smooth vodka. They attempt to use the persuasive technique of humour by
suggesting that not all people ‘go down smoothly’, but Belvedere will. Humour
has been found to increase attention and liking considerably more than adverts
that do not use it (Speck, 1991).
However, this humorous message was completely lost because
of the horrific connotations of rape suggested by the photograph. It implies that drinking Belvedere vodka will lead to rape or sexual abuse. Therefore, this
is likely to induce high levels of fear and threat, especially in females, who are
more vulnerable to rape. Research has shown that adverts that evoke extreme
fear are unsuccessful, as the viewer may defensively avoid attention or deny
personal vulnerability (Ray & Wilkie, 1970).
Rogers and Mewborn (1976)
investigated the effects of threat and self-efficacy on message rejection. 176
students participated in three video watching experiments based on the topics
of smoking, safe driving and venereal diseases. Each experiment had three
between subject’s manipulations: high/low noxiousness, high/low probability of
the event occurring and high/low efficacy of a coping response. Participants
fear arousal was assessed after watching the films. Results showed that
messages with high levels of threat and low levels of self-efficacy resulted in
message rejection. Therefore, Belvedere’s advert is likely to be rejected
because it is very threatening and portrays an uncontrollable situation with
high fear and low self-efficacy. Their results also support Leventhal’s danger
control process theory, which attempts to explain how fear appeals work.
Therefore, this is a bad advert, as they are linking their
brand with an undesired negative consequence (rape/sexual abuse), which will increase avoidance of the brand, leading to a decrease in sales and attractiveness of the Belvedere brand.
References:
Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of
fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances
in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119-186). New York: Academic
Press.
Ray, M. L., & W. L. Wilkie. (1970). Fear: The Potential
of an Appeal Neglected by Marketing. Journal
of Marketing 34, 54-61.
Rogers, R. W., & Mewborn, C. R. (1976). Fear appeals and
attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence,
and the efficacy of the coping responses. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 54-61.
Speck, P. S. (1991). The humorous message taxonomy: A
framework for the study of humorous ads. Journal
of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 13, 1–44.
Well done.
ReplyDelete