This radio advert uses the storytelling technique to
persuade the listener. It has been found that presenting information in story
format makes a message more persuasive as it gives evidence a causal structure,
making it seem credible (Hastie & Pennington, 2000). However this attempt
at persuasion is likely to have been ruined by the rapid disclaimers at the end
of the advert.
Research conducted by Herbst, Finkel, Allan and Fitzsimons
(2012) suggests that individuals see disclaimers that are spoken rapidly as a
deceitful strategy that advertisers use to manipulate consumers into
buying/using their services. Although in some contexts fast speech may be seen
as indicating intelligence, and thus be persuasive, it seems that in the
context of disclaimers in advertisements listeners are likely to think that the
advertisers are trying to deceive them by preventing close attention to the
content of the message by presenting it so quickly. Herbst et al (2012) played
participants an advertisement for ‘Apollo’, a made-up wireless device company.
One third of participants read that the brand was rated high on
trustworthiness, another read it was low on trustworthiness and the remaining
third received no information about the brand’s trustworthiness. The
participants heard the same advertisement with either a fast disclaimer at the
end or a disclaimer at the same pace as the rest of the advertisement. The participants who heard fast disclaimers indicated
significantly lower purchase intention (on a 7 point rating scale) when they
had no information about trustworthiness or were told the brand was
untrustworthy. However the participants who were told the brand was trustworthy
were not affected by disclaimer speed. The same effect was found when a real
established trusted brand was compared with an unknown brand. Therefore unless
a brand is widely known to be reputable (which I don’t think is the case with
this advertisement) the use of rapid disclaimers will reduce the effectiveness
of persuasion by evoking feelings of distrust towards the advertiser. In their
second experiment Herbst et al (2012) found that fast disclaimers led to lower
purchase intention even when the content of the disclaimer was positive. This
suggests that disclaimer speed acts as a heuristic cue used by individuals to
determine if the claims made can be trusted.
Many TV advertisements now avoid this issue by having
disclaimers (which are required for the advertisement to adhere to industry
regulations) printed at the bottom of the screen rather than being read aloud
at the end of the advertisement.
Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (2000). Explanation-based
decision making. In T. Connolly, H. R. Arkes, & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making (2nd
ed., pp. 212-225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herbst, K.C., Finkel, E. J., Allan, D., & Fitzsimons, G.
M. (2012). On the dangers of pulling a fast one: Advertisement disclaimer
speed, brand trust, and purchase intention. Journal
of Consumer Research, 38, 909-919.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.