In
1999, the authorities at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam were looking to cut
costs. One of the most expensive jobs was keeping the floor of the men’s toilet
clean. Instead of politely reminding men not to pee on the floor, the Airport
Board had an idea: to etch a picture of a fly into each urinal. When they
implemented this technique, the cleaning bill reportedly fell by 80%, which
translated into major savings in maintenance costs (Sommer,
2009).
This
fly technique has now been employed worldwide, from JFK Airport, Singapore and
elementary bathrooms all over America, showing how a harmless bit of
engineering manages to attract people’s attention and alter their behaviour in
a positive way, without really having to do anything at all.
Nudging:
This
technique is what is known as a ‘Nudge’ - any feature of a person’s context
that encourages them to behave in a certain way (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008). The
‘Nudge’ policy approach took the United States and United Kingdom by storm in
2008, when Cass Sunstein and Richard Thaler released their groundbreaking book.
It described how a minimalist strategy could increase the likelihood that a
more responsible behaviour choice is made.
They
argue that we can exploit cognitive biases to nudge, or gently guide, people’s
behaviour into making choices that are better for them and for the rest of us
too – while always leaving them free to choose otherwise.
“Nudge
Units” and Behvaioural Insight teams are now employed across various Companies
and Governments globally.
Research – Nudge towards healthy
eating:
To
encourage healthier eating in a cafeteria, Rozin et al (2011) used strategic
placement of certain foods available to adults. They made slight changes in the
accessibility of different foods in a pay-by-weight-of-food salad bar, making
food more difficult to changing the serving utensil. They found that this
modestly, but reliably, reduced intake in the range of 8-16%.
It
is, as expected, that some nudges are much more successful than others, and it
can be argued that more needs to be done to actually change the internal
attitudes of people instead of merely guiding their behaviour, but there is no
doubt that it is a good place to start.
References:
Rozin, P., Scott, S., Dingley, M., Urbanek, J. K., Jiang,
H., & Kaltenbach, M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity I: Minor changes in
accessibility decrease food intake. Judgment
and Decision Making, 6, 323-332.
Sommer, L. (2009). When
Humans Need a Nudge Toward Rationality. The
New York Times. Retrieved from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/business/08nudge.html.
Thaler, R., &
Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving
Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. Boston: Yale University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.