Smoking's disgusting...
This is a recent anti-smoking advert that I witnessed whilst watching
something on All4. It depicts a father rolling, and then smoking a cigarette
made out of a disgusting substance, referred to as 'rotting flesh'. The
disgust I felt while watching this advert was intense and, in that instant,
stopped me from ever wanting to smoke. Mine-and anyone else's- reaction is
largely unsurprising however. This is because the advert uses disgust
deliberately. In fact, it uses both disgust, and a fear appeal to persuade
smokers to quit.
To those of whom a ‘fear appeal’ is a new term, it is a persuasion
tactic that threatens the viewer with the negative consequences of doing
something- in this case smoking (Fitzsimons, Morales, & Wu, 2012). In this
advert, a fear appeal is achieved by using a substance reminiscent of the type
of by-product smoking would leave in your body. Disgust is also used within
this advert, as the substance the father rolls is, again, an example of the ‘rotting
flesh’ (as the voice-over so nicely puts it) that resides in smokers’ bodies. When
he licks the ‘rotting flesh’ the disgust felt as a viewer is quite intense. This
has the impact of forcing smokers to face the horrifying consequences of their
actions, thus enhancing the fear appeal’s effects, and hopefully persuading smokers
to give up.
A study exploring the use of disgust and fear appeals to persuade
behaviour was carried out by Fitzsimons, Morales, and Wu (2012). In this study,
155 students witnessed an advertisement from the Montana Meth Project, aimed at
targeting meth-amphetamine use. Participants viewed either a neutral ad, an ad
using only a fear appeal, or an ad using both a fear appeal with disgust.
Participants were then asked a number of questions about the different
adverts.
Results
Regarding the likelihood that participants would use illegal drugs in future,
Fitzsimons, et al. (2012) found that the advert using both a fear appeal with
disgust was the most persuasive. To visually illustrate this, below is a
bar chart demonstrating the results regarding participants' likelihood to take
illegal drugs in future...
Additionally, participants that watched the disgusting advert were more
likely to change their behaviour quicker than participants watching the other
ads. This study is also a good one as, regarding alternate explanations,
Fitzsimons, et al. (2012) even went so far as to rule out the possibility
that the advert using disgust was only more persuasive because of its
vividness!
The
anti-smoking advert above is therefore an example of persuasion through use
of a fear appeal with disgust. The research by Fitzsimons, et al. (2012)
illustrates that this tactic can be effective in changing behaviour. So,
watch the ad and feel disgusted!
References
Fitzsimons, G. J., Morales, A. C., & Wu, E. C. (2012). How disgust
enhances the effectiveness of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing
Research, 49, 383-39
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.