For weeks, we’ve
been told to fill in the NSS. We constantly get updates and e-mails sent to us,
reminding us to fill in the survey.
“Third year students still have the opportunity to complete
the NSS survey at http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/. You’re doing fantastically well so far but
with over 60% of you already completing the survey but we’re still lagging
behind those theatre studies and politics students, so if you haven’t completed
the survey yet, log on to get a free lunch and get a chance to win a brand new
iPad.
The Psychology department now has a room (H138) where you can
complete the NSS too. Simply drop by, log in and go to
the website above”
The department has used the
persuasive technique of flattery to try to get us to complete the NSS. We keep
getting told how important it is, and we are told that we’re doing an amazing
job, and that everyone should fill it in as soon as possible. Flattery is a
widely used persuasive technique that we use all the time to get people to do
things that we want to. Simply adding a complimentary comment such as “beautiful”,
“pretty”, “handsome” can increase the chancs of someone doing something for
you. Hendrick, Borden, Giesen, Murray and Seyfried (1972) have found that
flattery increases the compliance with a request to complete a questionnaire
when controlled to a control condition. They had a total of 400 subjects who
were mailed a questionnaire that was either asking for a small effort request
of a one paged questionnaire, or a large effort request of a seven paged
questionnaire. There were several conditions in the cover letter than was
attached to the questionnaire: ingratiation of respondent, ingratiation of
solicitor, double ingratiation (both the solicitor and respondent were
flattered), or standard polite where neither was flattered. They then looked at
the number of participants that completed the questionnaire, which is
considered compliance to the request. This looked at the effect of flattery.
Table 1: Proportion of questionnaire returns
The results from Table 1 suggest that
there was no effect of flattery towards the small request on the one page
questionnaire. On the other hand, flattery appears to have a bigger effect.
When the solicitor and respondent was flattered, they had significantly high
return rates (0.24 and 0.29, respectively) compared to when they weren't
flattered at all (0.10). The results from this study suggest that the use of flattery
does have a positive effect on compliance, as it makes people more likely to do
things, especially for higher requests that are more difficult. This study
allows us to suggest that we can use flattery to get people to do things for us
– meaning that the Psychology department has been successful in trying to get
us to fill in the NSS, as they constantly remind us how fantastic we’re doing.
So.. you're probably an intelligent and wise Psychology student if you're reading this - have you filled in the NSS? ;)
So.. you're probably an intelligent and wise Psychology student if you're reading this - have you filled in the NSS? ;)
References
Hendrick, C., Borden, R., Glesen, M., Murray, E. J., & Seyfried, B. A. (1972). Effectiveness of ingratiation tactics in a cover letter on mail questionnaire response. Psychonomic Science, 26, 349-351
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.