In this scene, taken from Breaking Bad, we find the
up-and-coming drug kingpin Walter White trying to raise Jesse Pinkman’s
self-esteem and nurse his ego in order to get him selling their product again.
Walter employs the analogy of Jesse being like a Blowfish, to make Jesse think
no one will oppose him in the drugs trade:
-Walter White: “Intimidating, so that the other scarier fish are scared off. And that's you. You are a blowfish. You see? It's just all an illusion. See? It's nothing but air. Now, who messes with the blowfish, Jesse?”
-Jesse Pinkman: “Nobody.”
- WW: “You're damn right.”
- JP: “I'm a blowfish.”
- WW: “You are a blowfish. Say it again.”
-JP: “I'm a blowfish.”
- WW: “Say it like you mean it.”
-JP: “I'm a blowfish!”
-WW: “ That's it.”
-Walter White: “Intimidating, so that the other scarier fish are scared off. And that's you. You are a blowfish. You see? It's just all an illusion. See? It's nothing but air. Now, who messes with the blowfish, Jesse?”
-Jesse Pinkman: “Nobody.”
- WW: “You're damn right.”
- JP: “I'm a blowfish.”
- WW: “You are a blowfish. Say it again.”
-JP: “I'm a blowfish.”
- WW: “Say it like you mean it.”
-JP: “I'm a blowfish!”
-WW: “ That's it.”
In this discussion, Walter uses repetition to convey his
point to Jesse. The use of repetition is a stalwart in the plethora of
persuasion techniques, depicted in Zajonc’s (1968) classic research. The ‘mere
exposure effect’ occurs when repeated exposure to an argument increases the
target’s belief in the validity of the argument. The person trying to convey
the persuasive message must be careful not to overexpose the target however, as
they risk reducing the perceived validity of their argument.
This effect has been replicated, as seen in Cacioppo &
Petty (1979). Undergraduate students were either presented with an argument for
or against a certain way of funding a marginal increase in tuition fees either
0, 1, 3 or 5 times. The students were then asked to rate on a 15-point Likert
scale how much they agreed with the statement.
As seen in Graph 1 below, exposure to the statement 3 times
led to increased agreement with whichever statement the students were presented
with.
Graph 1: Demonstrating the increase and eventual decrease in student agreement with a statement as it is repeated (Cacioppo &
Petty1979).
By engaging Jesse with the act of repeating the “I’m a
blowfish!” statement, Walter persuades Jesse that he is the alleged, intimidating
blowfish. Jesse identifies positively with the concept and internalises the
fact that, yes, he is indeed a blowfish and proceeds to celebrate
appropriately.
References:
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979).
Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and
persuasion. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 37(1),
97.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of
mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(2p2),
1.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.