The advertisement here is intended to suggest to the reader
to start eating probiotic cheese. Here probiotic is defined as meaning: ‘Live
microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health
benefit on the host’, (FAO/WHO, 2002). While there are plenty of other
probiotic dairy products on the shelves, such as yoghurts, probiotic cheese is
something of a rarity due to the processes involved, (da Cruz et al, 2009). The
study cited on the poster states the most common benefits of probiotic dairy
products, (Weichselbaum,
2010).
The poster utilised two behaviour changing techniques. The
first is that of hypocrisy reduction, whereby someone is reminded of an ideal
behaviour, and then asked to reflect on an element of their behaviour that contradicts
this behaviour. An example of this is brought forward by Fried and Aronson, (1995),
who suggested that hypocrisy causes cognitive dissonance, and people feel
discomfort as a result. The technique is applied here in that people are
reminded that they try to have a healthy diet, something generally most people
see to be aspirational, and are than asked why they still have a certain type
of food, in this case non-probiotic cheese, which immediately contrasts it to a
healthy diet. The idea is to create a dissonance between the idea of a healthy
diet and eating normal cheese, which can immediately be rectified with the
solution presented below.
The second is the use of the rhetorical question. Under the
cognitive framework analysis, rhetorical questions used as opposed to a
statement can increase the effectiveness of the message as it is personal to
the reader, and the argument is generally pretty weak, rather than being a full
research paper for instance. Under these conditions the rhetorical question
would disrupt a more complicated message, but is made more effective because of
its simplicity, (Petty, Cacioppo &
Heesacker, 1981).
References
da
Cruz, A. G., Buriti, F. C. A., de Souza, C. H. B., Faria, J. A. F., & Saad,
S. M. I. (2009). Probiotic cheese: health benefits, technological and stability
aspects. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 20(8), 344-354.
Fried, C. B., & Aronson,
E. (1995). Hypocrisy, misattribution, and dissonance reduction. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(9), 925-933.
Joint
FAO/WHO Working Group. (2002). Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in
food. London:
World Health Organization, ON, Canada: Food and Agriculture Organization.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J.
T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion:
A cognitive response analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 40(3), 432.
Weichselbaum,
E. (2010). Potential benefits of probiotics–main findings of an in-depth
review. British Journal of Community Nursing, 15(3), 110-112.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.