This powerful advert is part of an effective campaign
based in Delhi that aims to rehabilitate victims of acids attacks and ban the
sale of acid. It is incredibly persuasive due to its clever use of shock
tactics. The advert copies the style of many popular beauty videos, but with
one key difference, the girl presenting is the victim of an acid attack.
Dahl,
Frankenberger and Machanda (2003) suggest shock tactics are an effective tool
for persuasion because they violate norms. This surprises the audience leading
them to use additional cognitive processing, such as retention and
elaboration, when presented with the shocking message. In addition, a violation of norms leads to
cognitive dissonance as it creates an inconsistency between an individuals beliefs and behaviour (Festinger, 1957). For example, an individual may think of themselves as a charitable or caring person, but this advert reminds the viewer of a cause they have not supported. Therefore, the viewer can resolve this dissonance by donating to the charity,
turning the negative emotion into a positive one.
However, using shock tactics can be risky. They can make people feel uncomfortable and thus, in order to reduce any dissonance they may be feeling, individuals may simply change the channel or hide the ad.
However, using shock tactics can be risky. They can make people feel uncomfortable and thus, in order to reduce any dissonance they may be feeling, individuals may simply change the channel or hide the ad.
References
Dahl,
D. W., Frankenberget, K.D., & Machanda, R.V. (2003). Does it pay to shock?
Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university
students. Journal of Advertising
Research, 43, 268-280.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.