Anyone who knows me personally would know
that when it comes to religion and God, I am a huge skeptic. However, by
looking at the statistics, it is obvious that a lot of people have been
convinced and persuaded by ‘God’s words and teachings’ (Pew Research
Center, 2015) .
Each person has their own personal reason for their belief, however, after a few
lectures on persuasion and influence, I soon came to recognise that many of the
techniques found to be persuasively successful have also been used by religion.
I agree that it would be a tremendous oversimplification to claim that these
techniques are the reason behind the spread and acceptance of theology. Nevertheless,
I do believe that they have a significant impact on people’s decision to
believe in a certain religion.
According to Robert Cialdini, one of the
six main principles that are involved when influencing people’s attitudes and
behaviour is the Reciprocity Principle. The principle states that
humans tend to give back, or reciprocate, the same behaviour that they have
received. Therefore, in order to be able to persuade someone to do something
for us, we must first do something for them. Once the favour has been done,
they would then feel indebted and thus more likely to be persuaded to behave in
a certain manner. Further support is provided Garner(2005)
who found that participants given a hand written note were more likely
to fill in a survey than those asked verbally. According to Cialdini, the
effort that had gone through writing a note was recognized by the participant
and obligated them into reciprocating that effort. This is why, participants
who were provided the hand written note were also found to provide better
quality responses. In religion, especially the Abrahamic ones, it is a common
belief that most of the things we possess, including our soul and body, were
created by the all-powerful God. Now, if I were to believe in God, I could
easily see how people would feel indebted and obligated to spend their lives
worshipping their creator.
The
Principle of Commitment and Consistency, which is another of Cialdini’s six
core principles, can also be found in the Abrahamic religions. According to
this principle, people are more likely to actually do something once they have
publicly claimed or promised to do so. Once we make a promise, we feel obliged
to fulfill our promise and stay true to our words. In addition, once we have
made a decision and committed to something, we try and convince ourselves that
we have made the right call by developing new justifications to confirm our
decision. One of the most obvious examples of this tactic being used in
religion is the sacrament of Confirmation performed in Christianity. The
confirmation ritual allows those who have already been baptized to confirm
their belief and the promises made on their behalf. Unfortunately, the act of
baptism, which is mainly performed at infancy, creates a sense of commitment
itself, and many would feel obliged to stay consistent with the decision made
on their behalf as a child. In addition, most Catholic churches carry out the
ritual around the age of 14, when the child still lacks the intellectual
capacity and sufficient knowledge needed to make such a significant judgment.
This is one of the reasons why many people, including myself, believe
that the notion of theology should not be introduced to a child until much later in their
lives. If we were to allow children to live the first 20 years of their lives
without the mention of any God or religion, we would be able to provide
them with the opportunity to make a well-balanced decision, rather than
indoctrinate them and force them down a certain path.
Another
persuasive tactic, which arguably could be religions’ most effective technique,
is providing a sense of belonging. This was actually brought to my attention by
an atheist friend who claimed that growing up in a Hindu family, with religious
parents and relatives, actually created a sense of alienation for her. The
religion, according to her, formed a community for the rest, which she felt
left out of. As pointed out in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, we are social
beings who need to interact and communicate
with one another. Religion,
tactfully, uses this need and merges social interaction and religious rituals
together, hence creating a community of people with similar attitudes and
beliefs. This, in my opinion, is actually one of the few positive aspects of
religion. However, this too can be used as a persuasive tool, especially if a
person does not already hold a strong view towards a certain faith. People who
are born or move into such communities with different beliefs may begin to feel
excluded. In order to be able to feel like they belong, they may begin to
partake in some of theses rituals. Eventually, this could create a cognitive
dissonance, where one’s attitudes are no longer aligned with their behaviour. However,
as mentioned previously, people seek consistency and thus when an inconsistency
arises, they begin to try and change something in order to eliminate the dissonance. Many would consider changing their behaviour
first, however, unsurprisingly, humans find it more difficult to change their behaviour
than their attitude. In our case, their behaviour allows them to interact with
the rest of the community and provides them with a sense of belonging. Hence,
in most cases, it is our attitudes that are changed to accommodate our
behaviour.
The last technique that I will be
discussing is the ‘appeal to fear’. Fear appeal is when persuasion is attempted
through the presentation of potential risk and an arousal of fear. The stimuli creates
a sense of anxiety, which in turn leads to a negative physiological state that compels
the body to respond in any way in order to get rid of the threat and
decrease the level of distress. If we take a look at Islam and Christianity, we
are able to see that their Gods have presented them with similar notions of
hell; a place made for the torment and punishment of those who have sinned and
disobeyed His laws. By presenting them with an endless fear-evoking stimulus,
many people may alter their beliefs and attitudes purely to eradicate the sense
of anxiety. As Bertrand Russell points out, “Religion is based primarily and mainly upon fear. It
is partly the terror of the unknown and partly the wish to feel that you have a
kind of elder brother who will stand by you in all your troubles and disputes.
Fear is the basis of the whole thing – fear of the mysterious, fear of defeat,
fear of death” (Russell, 1957) .
As
mentioned previously, persuasive techniques may not be the only answer to why
religion has been able to spread so vastly, yet it is one of many rational
responses. Most of the techniques I have discussed do not refer to logic in any
way and instead, they appeal to emotions such as fear and a sense of belonging.
Maybe if the ideas proposed were a bit more realistic and consistent, then they
would no longer need to scare us into believing; reasoning with us would be
enough.
References
Garner,
R. (2005). Post-It® Note Persuasion: A Sticky Influence. Journal of
Consumer Psychology , 15 (3), 230-237.
Huitt,
W. (2007). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Educational Psychology
Interactive
Pew Research Center. (2015, April 2). The Future of
World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050. Retrieved
November 29, 2016, from Pew Research Center:
http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/
Russell, B. (1957). Why I am not a Christian, and other
essays on religion and related subjects. New York City, NY: Simon and
Schuster.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.