Sports England has recently launched a
campaign to inspire and motivate women around the world to enjoy sports and
become more physically active. The core message of the video is that women need
to overcome their fear of being judged and take a step towards a healthy
lifestyle. In this particular video, advertisers accomplish this goal by
featuring plain looking, regular women rather than models and athletes. These
women are shown to face similar challenges as would any other ordinary woman
while they exercise. They are sweating profusely and have make-up running down
their faces and yet they do not seem to care about their appearance while they
work out. The persuasive strategy applied here is called ‘similarity
altercasting’, also known as ‘plain folks’ technique. This video targets an audience of
women who do not have a great body image of themselves or are scared of looking
awful while they exercise. This hinders their participation in the kind of
sports they enjoy. Demonstration of high levels of similarities between the
viewers and the characters in the advertisement makes it more likely that the
audience will identify with them and model their behaviour.
Identification with media characters together
with perception of positive outcomes of their actions can increase the
probability of a behaviour being modelled (Nabi, 2009). In this video women are
shown to be taking pleasure in a range of activities. Cultural assumptions
about femininity do not seem to prevent them from engaging in all kinds of sports.
As a result the audience would associate exercising with positive emotions like
happiness and enjoyment rather than negative feelings like embarrassment and
therefore indulge more in it.
This
similarity altercasting effect was observed in a study where school children
were exposed to an adult who was either very similar or dissimilar to them in his
attributes. He told half of the group of children that he was a very skillful deep
sea diver, while to the other half he described himself as lacking in those
skills. He also told them about his inclinations relevant to deep sea diving.
Children assessed themselves on these skills before and after meeting the adult
and also indicated their preferences.
Table 3 shows that participants who shared a higher number of first similar attributes (FSAs) with the model were more likely to accept his preferences as their own.In the high similarity condition, the mean number of model's preferences chosen by the students was higher (m= 4.93) as compared to in the low similarity condition (m=4.13).Results show that children who perceived themselves as more similar to the adult were more likely to agree with his preferences (Burnstein, Stotland & Zander, 1961).
Table 3 shows that participants who shared a higher number of first similar attributes (FSAs) with the model were more likely to accept his preferences as their own.In the high similarity condition, the mean number of model's preferences chosen by the students was higher (m= 4.93) as compared to in the low similarity condition (m=4.13).Results show that children who perceived themselves as more similar to the adult were more likely to agree with his preferences (Burnstein, Stotland & Zander, 1961).
Condition of Similarity
|
Attributes of
model
|
||
Positive
|
Negative
|
Both types
of attributes combined
|
|
High similarity
|
4.95
(21)
|
4.89
(19)
|
4.93
(40)
|
Low similarity
|
4.11
(19)
|
4.15
(20)
|
4.13
(39)
|
Significance of difference between rows by
one-tailed t-test
|
P<.01
|
P<.02
|
P<.01
|
Table: Mean
numbers of model’s preferences chosen by subjects in high similarity and low
similarity condition.
The take
home message is that the audience tends to be persuaded by a message
if they find it easier to identify with its source (i.e. media characters).
REFERENCES
Burnstein, E., Stotland, E., & Zander, A. (1961). Similarity to the model and self-evaluation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,62,257-264.
Nabi, R. L. (2009). Cosmetic surgery makeover programs and intentions to undergo cosmetic enhancements: A consideration of three media effects theories. Human Communication Research, 35, 1 – 27.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.