One of the first techniques that
Chandler uses is flattery in which he compliments Rachel on her
outfit. Flattery has been shown to increase preference for resolving
conflict through collaboration and reduce preference for resolving
conflict through avoidance (Baron et al, 1990). This is because
flattery induces positive affect, which enhances prosocial
organisational behaviours, therefore making someone more cooperative.
Kim et al. (2003) tested the effect of
being given positive vs. negative feedback before, during and after
negotiation. They found that flattery increased cooperativeness in
negotiating, further supporting its power in negotiating techniques.
Chandler successfully gets Rachel to
unlock him from his handcuffs the first time by making her feel
guilty about him being stuck there. He claims that he is cold and
could be left there for hours, which successfully pulls of Rachel's
heart string, and makes her feel responsible. Guilt is a popular
persuasive technique often used in advertising. It is most commonly
used by charity organisations who, often successfully, get people to
donate money by making them feel guilty for not helping others. Butt
et al. (2005) found that when negotiators feel guilty, they may want
to avoid negotiation or complete the negotiation session as quickly
as possible in order to reduce their exposure to the negative event.
When a negotiator feels guilty, they are more likely to use
compromising behaviour to reach an agreement quickly by taking a
middle ground, resulting in at least partially satisfactory outcomes.
Chandler only mentions in one sentence that he is cold, and Rachel
changes her mind straight away and agrees to release him, showing
that his guilt-tripping worked with immediate effect.
These are just a few of the negotiation
techniques used in the scene which successfully show the power of
subtle persuasive techniques to help you get what you really want!
By Katie Lawton
Baron, R. A., Fortin, S. P., Frei, R.
L., Hauver, L. A., & Shack, M. L. (1990). Reducing organizational
conflict: The role of socially-induced positive affect. International
Journal of Conflict Management, 1,
133-152.
Butt,
A. N., Choi, J. N., & Jaeger, A. M. (2005). The effects of
self-emotion, counterpart emotion, and counterpart behaviour on
negotiator behaviour: a comparison of individual-level and dyad-level
dynamics. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 26,
681-704.
Kim, P. H., Diekmann, K. A., &
Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2003). Flattery may get you somewhere: The
strategic implications of providing positive vs. negative feedback
about ability vs. ethicality in negotiation. Organisational
Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 90, 225-243.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.