This letter from the UK charity
‘Crisis at Christmas’ was sent to households in December 2014. The letter aimed
to persuade the reader to donate £21.62 to the charity. This sum was needed to fund
one place for a homeless person over the Christmas period, in a centre
providing food, companionship, healthcare and advice.
The charity used the persuasive technique
of encouraging empathy to persuade the reader to donate. Having empathy for
someone involves being aware of that person’s internal cognitions and being
distressed on their behalf (Pratkanis, 2007). By describing a homeless person’s
feelings of isolation, and by directly quoting a homeless person, the charity allowed
the reader to imagine what homeless people are experiencing and to feel sorry
for them.
Toi and Batson (1982) provide
evidence that empathy influences helping behaviour. In their study, participants
listened to a recording of a freshman student being interviewed. The student
explained in the interview that she had been in a car accident and had
therefore missed a month of her introductory psychology course, which all of
the participants were also taking. She stated that she would have to drop the
class if she did not manage to find a student to help her catch up.
The experiment had a 2x2 design.
For the first independent variable, participants were either in an ‘observe’
condition, in which they were instructed to be objective while listening,
ignore how the interviewee felt, and just attend to the facts, or an ‘imagine’
condition, in which they were instructed to imagine how the interviewee felt,
without concern for all of the information presented. The ‘imagine’ condition
increased empathic emotion.
After listening to the interview,
participants were given a letter from the student, which asked for their help
in catching up the material from class. The second independent variable was the
difficulty of escape. In the ‘easy-escape’ condition, the letter stated that
the participant could meet up with the student wherever they wanted. In the
‘difficult-escape’ condition, the letter stated that the student would be in
class the next week. Those in the ‘difficult-escape’ condition would therefore
definitely see the student in the future, and would not be able to avoid her.
Helping behaviour was measured as whether participants completed a form
indicating that they would assist the student.
Note. From “More evidence that
empathy is a source of altruistic motivation” by M. Toi and C. D. Batson, 1982,
Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 43, 281-292.
Table 1 displays the results from
this study. It shows the proportion of participants who helped in each of the
four combinations of conditions. The ‘observe-easy-escape’ combination resulted
in a significantly lower proportion of helping behaviour (.33) than each of the other
combinations (‘observe-difficult-escape' = .76, ‘imagine-easy-escape’ = .71, ‘imagine-difficult-escape’ = .81). The other combinations did not produce significant differences
from each other in helping behaviour. This shows that those who ‘observe’, and do
not experience empathy, are more likely to help when it is difficult to escape
than when it is easy. However, the helping behaviour of those who ‘imagine’,
and experience empathy, is unaffected by the difficulty of leaving the
situation.
These results support the
empathy-altruism hypothesis. This contends that empathy leads to altruistic motivation,
where the individual wants to improve another’s welfare and can only achieve
this goal by assisting the person (Batson, Duncan, Ackerman, Buckley, &
Birch, 1981). Without empathy, as Batson et al. (1981) explain, the helper may
have egoistic motivation, which means that they want to reduce their own
personal distress, and they will escape rather than help if the costs of
escaping are low.
By encouraging empathy, the charity’s
letter therefore engenders an altruistic motive for donating, which is likely
to be effective, because the only way for the reader to achieve this altruistic
goal of alleviating others’ distress is to donate.
References
Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch,
K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 40, 290-302.
Pratkanis, A. R. (2007). Social influence analysis: An index of
tactics. In A. R. Pratkanis (Ed.), The
science of social influence: Advances and future progress (pp. 17-82). New
York: Psychology Press.
Toi, M., & Batson, C. D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a
source of altruistic motivation. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 281-292.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.