In my career as a dog trainer, I will use a range of
behavioural analysis techniques to train dogs in a variety of ways: for
instance using positive reinforcement to train sniffer dogs and negative
reinforcement to train guard dogs to bark at intruders.
In training sniffer dogs, I will be employing classical
conditioning and reinforcement. Using classical conditioning, I’ll make a dog (we’ll
call him Scooby) associate his favourite tug-of-war toy with the drugs or
illegal substances I want him to find by making the toy smell if those
substances. Then I’ll hide or bury the toy in really easy to find places.
Scooby will then (hopefully) go searching for the toy by following the scent of
the drugs associated with it. When Scooby has found the toy, I’ll play with him
to positively reinforce that he’s performed the correct behaviour. This will
make him more likely to sniff it out again every time he can smell it, (Adams
& Johnson, 1994). Slowly, I’ll remove the tug-of-war toy and just hide
drugs, which Scooby will then sniff out because he thinks he’s going to find
his toy. When he finds the drugs, I’ll be sure to reward him with a game of
tug-of-war straight away, so he still associates the scent of drugs with
playing. Whenever Scooby is then in a situation where he is supposed to sniff
out drugs, (assuming they’re actually there) he’ll be willing to do so because
he knows he’ll be rewarded with a nice tug-of-war game afterwards.
When training guard dogs, I may have to use negative
reinforcement. In electronic training, electric collars attached to dogs which
give dogs shocks when triggered by pressurised mats, and are stopped by a dog’s
(we’ll go for Lassie this time) bark (Schilder, & van der Borg, 2004). If
intruders step on these mats then a shock is given to (poor) Lassie. The shock
acts as an aversive, painful stimulus causing Lassie to bark, warning off
intruders. But when Lassie barks for long enough, the shock stops! This means
the shock acts as a negative reinforcer; to remove the aversive stimulus,
Lassie learns she must bark whenever she experiences it, which strengthens the
chance of her barking when it happens, and scaring off intruders at the same
time.
References
Adams, G. J., & Johnson, K. G. (1994). Sleep, work and
the effect of shift work in drug detector dogs Canis familiaris. Applied Animal Behavioural Science, 41,
115-126.
Schilder, M., & van der Borg, J. (2004).
"Training dogs with help of the shock collar: short and long term
behavioral effects". Applied
Animal Behaviour Science, 85(3),
319–334.
Katherine Stevens
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.