“Right ladies, let’s get ready to hit the town” cue: *all
ladies run to get their dresses, lashes, hooker heels and ingredients for their
cake face* - or not in this
advertisement, as the audience begin to witness
the unravelling of a rather shocking twist to the typical night out
preparations and I am not talking about running out of mascara. The purpose of
this advertisement is to show the not so glamorous side of binge drinking, and
instead questions the logic behind binge drinking “you wouldn’t start a night
like this, so why end it this way” – which is actually, very true. However,
just for the sake of some nice imagery, they portray a young lady starting her
night in this very dreaded way, from the highly forbade tearing of tights (keep
it classy ladies) to smothering herself in vomit – I believe the correct term
is a hot mess.
The power behind this advertisement roots from the effective
use of Goldenberg’s (1999) consequences template. This particular strategy is
executed through portraying the terrifying consequences of binge drinking as a
horrific set of actions followed by the preventative measure in the form of a
message “know your limits” – in other words, don’t get wasted. This message is
further emphasised through the use of a Similarity Altercast, the young lady in
the advertisement resembles the target audience, she is not a Megan Fox or a
Susan Boyle, but she could very much be one of your friends, and that is a very
scary thought as it brings the consequences far closer to home. Berscheid
(1966) found that similarity between the source (the young lady) and the target
audience (the young generation) increases compliance of the persuasive message.
Another interesting strategy deployed by this advertisement
is the use of shock. As an audience, it is not uncommon to assume that we are
watching a lady get ready for a night on the tiles, but from the moment she
rips her tights, we are shocked, but it is still redeemable at this point
(maybe she was feeling kinky?), and then we get to the vomit smothering – your tummy
turns and your eyes squint as you begin to ask yourself: “did she really just
do that?” – you open your eyes, and realise she did. Research suggests that
advertisements that employ a shock factor are far more persuasive than fear
inducing advertisements (Dahl et al., 2003) and after watching this advert,
that finding is not surprising.
Funnily enough, most women don’t want to end their night
like this, let alone start it that way which begs the question – why do we
allow ourselves to get into such states? The reality is, whilst this woman’s
actions are shocking, we are only about ten jagerbombs away from being her so
the next time you order a drink stick to something a little softer and keep it
classy ladies.
Berscheid, E. (1966). Opinion change and
communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 670.
Dahl, D.W., Frankenberger, K.D., & Manchanda, R. V.
(2003). Does It Pay to Shock? Reactions to Shocking and Nonshocking Advertising
Content among University Students. Journal of Advertising Research,43,268-280.
Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., Solomon, S. (1999). The
fundamental templates of quality ads. Marketing
Science, 18, 333-351.
Great tone and analysis.
ReplyDelete