In this court scene clip from Legally Blonde (2001) the character of Elle is currently training
to become a lawyer and renowned for her knowledge in hair, beauty and fashion.
In this scene (from 2:00 onward) she uses this to her advantage when she
structures her explanation of how she believes the witness is lying in a story
format. This technique enables the jury to visualize the order of events and
thus pick out where the witness had lied and how the lawyer’s previous questioning
had uncovered this.
Hastie & Pennington (2000) state that plausible stories
guide thought, determine the creditably of information and ultimately direct
evaluation about story-related decisions. This can clearly be seen within this
clip as the story framed the evidence and facts Elle’s character had just
discovered about the witness’ whereabouts at the time of the murder.
This is supported by Slusher and Anderson (1996) who
discovered that they were more effective in arguing that the AIDS virus is not
spread by casual contact when they used facts embedded in a casual structure on
how the disease is transmitted compared to when they used statistical facts. They
also found out that such casual stories or social theories tend to persist even
if they are facing strong, discrediting information. Therefore, reinforcing the
effective use a particular structure- such as that of a story- to explain the
evidence and facts in a more influential way.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.