The above print advert depicts a ‘humorous’ pun
relating to a popular phrase. However, it is conducted in a distasteful manner.
Advertising
agencies use controversial advertisements in an attempt to be seen as creative
and to distinguish themselves from competitors (Waller, 1999). Although controversial
adverts can be successful (e.g., Benetton), the risk that such an advertisement may damage the company is prominent (Waller, 1999).
Chan, Li,
Diehl and Terlutter (2007) conducted an experiment to assess how controversial advertisements
impact on (potential) consumers. They constructed
a questionnaire consisting of 6 offensive print adverts. Following each advert,
the participant had to indicate which of the 12 adjectives best described it.
Of the 12 adjectives, 6 were negative (offensive, uncomfortable, irritating,
disgusting, ridiculous and impolite) and 6 were positive (convincing, lively,
interesting, informative, creative and clever). Finally, the participant
indicated his or her intentions to reject the product and brand on the basis of
the advert using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very unlikely, 5 = very likely). The
results showed that if the advert was perceived increasingly negative, there
was a higher likelihood that the participant would also reject the product and
the brand.
References:
Waller, D.S. (1999). Attitudes
towards offensive advertising: an Australian study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 3,288 – 295.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.